A04474:1838
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 4 › M. Harding. The .24. Division.Article 4 › M. Hardinge. The .24. Diuision.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
M. Harding. The .24. Division.
M. Hardinge. The .24. Diuision.
Of the Bishop of Rome his punishing of offenders, by Censures of the Church, and otherwise, as by Excommunication, Ejection, Deposition, and enjoining penance for transgressions: we have more examples then I think good to recite here. They that have knowledge of the Ecclesiastical stories, may remember, how Timotheus Bishop of Alexandria was Excommunicated with Peter his Deacon, by Simplicius the Pope: Nestorius Bishop of Constantinople, by Coelestinus: Theophilus Bishop of Alexandria with Arcadius the Emperor, and Eudoxia the Empress, by Innocentius, for their wicked demeanour toward Chrysostom: Howe Dioscorus Bishop of Alexandria was deposed, though the whole 2. Ephesine Council stood in his defence: Howe Peter Bishop of Antioch, was not only put out of his Bishopric, but also of all Priestly honour: Howe Photius was put out of the Patriarkeship of Constantinople, into which he was intruded by favour of Michael the Emperor, at the suit of his wicked uncle, by Nicolas the first.
Of the Bishop of Rome his punishinge of offenders, by Censures of the Churche, and otherwise, as by Excommunication, Eiection, Deposition, and enioyninge penance for transgressions: we haue more examples then I thinke good to recite here. They that haue knowlege of the Ecclesiastical stories, maye remember, howe Timotheus Bishop of Alexandria was Excommunicated with Peter his Deacon, by Simplicius the Pope: Nestorius Bishop of Constantinople, by Coelestinus: Theophilus Bishop of Alexandria with Arcadius the Emperour, and Eudoxia the Empresse, by Innocentius, for their wicked demeanour towarde Chrysostome: Howe Dioscorus Bishop of Alexandria was deposed, though the whole 2. Ephesine Councel stoode in his defence: Howe Peter Bishop of Antioche, was not onely put out of his Bishoprike, but also of al Priestly honour: Howe Photius was put out of the Patriarkeship of Constantinople, into whiche he was intruded by fauour of Michael the Emperour, at the sute of his wicked vnkle, by Nicolas the first.