A04474:1897
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 4 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 4 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
First, M. Harding supposeth, that this Latin word, Reconciliatio, can in no wise stand amongst equals: and besides that, touching the Reconciliation of the Church of Antioch, as it shall appear, he misreporteth the whole story.
First, M. Hardinge supposeth, that this Latine woorde, Reconciliatio, can in no wise stande emongst equalles: and bisides that, touching the Reconciliation of the Churche of Antioche, as it shal appeare, he misreporteth the whole storie.
Upon such grounds these proofs be builded. For M. Harding knoweth, that, as Submission is made by the subject towards his Prince, so Reconciliation1 in proper manner of speech, is made between equal friends.
Upon suche groundes these proufes be builded. For M. Harding knoweth, that, as Submission is made by the subiecte towardes his Prince, so Reconciliation1 in proper manner of speache, is made bitwéene equal frendes.
- 1Reconciliation.
Concerning that is here touched of Eulalius, the matter needeth no long answer. The story being truly known, is sufficient to answer it self. It is certain, as we have before declared more at large, and as it plainly appeareth by the Acts of the Council of Africa, that Zosimus the Bishop of Rome, to the intent to advance him self over all other Bishops, manifestly falsified the Nicene Council. This forgery in the Council of Africa was disclosed, & laid abroad to the eyes of all the world. The Bishops there being in number two hundred and seventeen, saw, that one Apiarius a Priest, whom they for his open outrage, and wickedness had Excommunicate, was without any further examining of the matter, only upon his bare complaint, admitted again unto the Communion, and received into favour, in despite of all their doings, by the Bishop of Rome.