A04474:2618
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 10 › M. Harding. The .1. Division.Article 10 › M. Hardinge. The .1. Diuision.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
M. Harding. The .1. Division.
M. Hardinge. The .1. Diuision.
In this Sacrament after Consecration, (175)1 nothing in Substance remaineth, that was before, neither Bread, nor Wine, but only the Accidents of Bread and wine: as their form, and shape, savour, smell, colour, weight, and such the like, which here have their being miraculously without their subject: for as much as* after Consecration, there is none other substance, then the substance of the Body and Blood of our Lord, which is not affected with such Accidents, as the Scholastical Doctors term it. Which Doctrine hath always, though not with these precise terms, (176)3 been taught, and believed from the beginning, and dependeth of the Article of Transubstantiation. For if the substance of Bread and Wine be changed into the Substance of the Body and Blood of our Lord (177)4 (which is constantly affirmed by all the learned and Ancient Fathers of the Church) it followeth by a necessary sequel in nature, and by▪ drift of Reason, that then the Accidents only remain. For witness and proof whereof, I will not let to recite certain most manifest sayings of the old, and best approved Doctors.
In this Sacrament after Consecration, (175)1 nothinge in Substance remaineth, that was before, neither Breade, nor VVine, but onely the Accidentes of Breade and wine: as their forme, and shape, sauour, smel, coloure, weight, and suche the like, which here haue their beinge miraculousely without their subiecte: for as muche as