A04474:304
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 1 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 1 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now to add a little more hereunto touching the nature of this word Communio, wherein you so uncourteousely charge all others with ignorance, and lack of learning, as it pleaseth you to do through out your whole book, I think it not amiss to show you, what certain writers both old and new have thought and written in that behalf. I need not here to allege the words that S. Paul useth touching the holy Communion,1 We are all one Bread, all one Body, as many as do Communicate of one Bread: Neither that S. Hierome saith, The Lords Supper must be common: Neither that Chrysostom▪ The thing that is the Lords, they make Private: But the Lords things are not this servants, or that servants, but common to all: Neither that S. Augustine saith,2 Hunc cibum & potum, societatem vult intelligi Corporis, & membrorum suorum, He would have us to understand, that this Meat, and Drink is the fellowship of his Body, and of his members: Neither that Chrysostom saith, Quidnam appello Communicationem? Idem ipsum Corpus sumus. Quidnam significat Panis? Corpus Christi. Quid fiunt qui accipiunt? Corpus Christi. What cal I the Communication,3 or Communion? we are all one self same Body. What signifieth the Bread? The Body of Christ. And what are they made that receive it? The Body of Christ. Although these Fathers by these words do manifestly declare, that the holy Mysteries in their time were divided commonly to the whole people: yet will I take no advantage thereof, for that M. Harding will reply, they come not precisely to the nature of this word Communio.
Now to adde a litle more hereunto toutchinge the nature of this woorde Communio, wherein you so vncourteousely charge al others with ignorance, and lacke of learninge, as it pleaseth you to doo through out your whole booke, I thinke it not amisse to shew you, what certaine writers bothe olde and newe haue thought and written in that behalfe. I néede not here to allege the woordes that S. Paule vseth touchinge the holy Communion,1 We are al one Breade, al one Bodie, as many as doo Communicate of one Breade: Neither that S. Hierome saithe, The Lordes Supper must be common: Neither that Chrysostome The thinge that is the Lordes, they make Priuate: But the Lordes thinges are not this seruantes, or that seruantes, but common to al: Neither that S. Augustine saithe,