A04474:3399
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 17 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 17 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
He saith, These words, Is Given, Is Shed, be words of Sacrificing, though the Term it self of Oblation, and Sacrifice, be not expressed. Here M. Harding, besides that he hath imagined a strange Construction of his own, that never any learned man knew before, and so straggleth alone, and swerveth from all the Old Fathers, includeth also a Repugnance, and Contradiction against him self. For, where as Words, and Terms sound both one thing, the one being mere English, the other borrowed of the Latin, M. Harding saith, Christ in the Institution of his Supper, used the Words of Sacrificing, and yet expressed not the Terms of Sacrificing. Such Privilege these men have, with shift of terms to beguile the World. For if Christ used the Words of Sacrificing, how can M. Harding say, He used not the Terms of Sacrificing? And if he used not the Terms (Words, and Terms being one thing) how can he say, He used the words?
He saith, These woordes, Is Geuen, Is Shead, be woordes of Sacrificinge, thoughe the Terme it selfe of Oblation, and Sacrifice, be not expressed. Here M. Hardinge, bisides that he hath imagined a strange Construction of his owne, that neuer any learned man knewe before, and so straggleth alone, and swarueth from al the Olde Fathers, includeth also a Repugnance, and Contradictiō against him selfe. For, where as Woordes, and Termes sounde bothe one thinge, the one beinge mere Englishe, the other borowed of the Latine, M. Harding saithe, Christe in the Institution of his Supper, vsed the VVoordes of Sacrificing, and yet expressed not the Termes of Sacrificinge. Suche Priuilege these menne haue, with shifte of termes to beguile the Worlde. For yf Christe vsed the Woordes of Sacrificinge, howe can M. Hardinge saie, He vsed not the Termes of Sacrificinge? And yf he vsed not the Termes (Woordes, and Termes beinge one thinge) how can he saie, He vsed the woordes?