A04474:3933
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 24 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 24 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Likewise is John Duns driven to say, touching the same: 1Illa propositio, Hoc est Corpus meum, non est Consecrativa, nec ut Vera, nec ut Falsa: sed ut est propositio neutra: This sentence, Hoc est Corpus meum, is not the Sentence of Consecration, neither as it is True, nor as it is False: but only as it is a Sentence neuter between both, that is to say, neither true, nor false.
Likewise is Iohn Duns driuen to say, touchinge the same: 1Illa propositio, Hoc est Corpus meum, non est Consecratiua, nec vt Vera, nec vt Falsa: sed vt est propositio neutra: This sentence, Hoc est Corpus meum, is not the Sentence of Consecration, neither as it is True, nor as it is False: but onely as it is a Sentence neuter bitweene bothe, that is to say, neither true, nor false.
- 1Scotus in 4. Sentent. dist. 8. qu. 3.
Al this notwithstanding, D. Steven Gardiner, not greatly regarding the Authority of any of these Doctors, in his first book of the Sacrament, entitled, ⟨p. 631⟩The Devils Sophistry, 1writeth thus, Christ spake plainly, This is my Body, making demonstration of the Bread. Which last exposition being true, if this pronoun, Hoc, signified the material Bread, that Christ held in his hand, then, by M. Hardinges Doctrine, that Very Material Bread was in deed, and Verily the Body of Christ.
Al this notwithstandinge, D. Steuen Gardiner, not greately regardinge the Authoritie of any of these Doctours, in his first booke of the Sacrament, intitled, ⟨p. 631⟩