A04474:500
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 1 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 1 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Al manner Single Communions be lawful: Or in the other argument, Al manner single Communions are lawful for a woman. So shall ye soon find out the folly.
Al manner Single Communions be lawful: Or in the other argument, Al manner single Communions are lawful for a woman. So shal ye soone finde out the folie.
Further Medius Terminus, that holdeth and knitteth the argument, must agree with the Subiectum and Praedicatum in circumstance of time, of place, of person, of subject, and part of subject. With which circumstances a thing may be lawful: and without the same may be unlawful. For example, It is thought lawful for a woman to Baptize at home: but it is not thought lawful for a woman to baptize in the open Church: yet is the thing all one: but the circumstance of place being changed, changeth the whole. Again, it is lawful for a Priest to minister the Sacrament in the forenoon, and in the Church: but it is not lawful for a Priest to Minister the Sacrament after he hath dined, or in his bed: Yet was it lawful for S. Ambrose, and others so to receive the Sacrament. We see therefore, there is great matter in alteration of the circumstance.
Further Medius Terminus, that holdeth and knitteth the argument, muste agrée with the Subiectum and Praedicatum in circumstance of time, of place, of person, of subiecte, and parte of subiecte. With whiche circumstances a thinge may be lawful: and without the same may be vnlawful. For example, It is thought lawful for a woman to Baptize at home: but it is not thought lawful for a woman to baptize in the open Churche: yet is the thinge al one: but the circumstance of place beinge changed, changeth the whole. Againe, it is lawful for a Priest to minister the Sacrament in the forenoone, and in the Church: but it is not lawful for a Prieste to Minister the Sacrament after he hath dined, or in his bedde: Yet was it lawful for S. Ambrose, and others so to receiue the Sacrament. We sée therefore, there is greate mater in alteration of the circumstance.