A04474:798
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 2 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 2 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Yet M. Harding saith, The same place may be taken also of the sacramental eating. But Lyra thinketh no, 1and therefore addeth further: Hoc verbum nihil directe pertinet ad Sacramentalem, vel corporalem manducationem. Nam hoc verbum fuit dictum diu, antequam Sacramentum Eucharistiae esset institutum. Ex illa igitur litera, de sacramentali Communione, non potest fieri argumentum efficax: These words pertain not directly unto the Sacramental or Corporal eating. For it was spoken long before the Sacrament was ordained. Therefore out of this letter, there cannot be made any good argument for the Sacramental Communion.
Yet M. Hardinge saithe, The same place may be taken also of the sacramental eatinge. But Lyra thinketh no, 1and therefore addeth further: Hoc verbum nihil directe pertinet ad Sacramentalem, vel corporalem manducationem. Nam hoc verbum fuit dictum diu, antequam Sacramentum Eucharistiae esset institutum. Ex illa igitur litera, de sacramentali Communione, non potest fieri argumentum efficax: These woordes pertaine not directly vnto the Sacramental or Corporal eatinge. For it was spoken longe before the Sacrament was ordeined. Therefore out of this letter, there cannot be made any good argument for the Sacramental Communion.
- 1Nicol. Lyra in Psalm. 111.
Likewise one Michael Uaehe one of late years, 1a man of M. Hardinges own side, touching the same matter, writeth thus: Infirmum est argumentum: Quae enim de spirituali manducatione dicta sunt, ille ad sacramentalem torquet. This (sayeth he) is but a weak reason: For the words that be spoken of spiritual eating, he applieth to the Sacramental eating. Here may M. Harding see, besides S. Augustine, Origen, & other old Catholic Fathers, whose words I have not alleged, what men he hath called new Masters. Nicolas Lyra was an English man, and lived two hundred years before Luther: Michael Uaehe was of late years, and wrote namely against Luther. Verily if Christ and his Apostles were now conversant in