A04474:907
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 2 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 2 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now, notwithstanding we have granted that S. Augustine expoundeth this place of the Sacrament, yet doth not S• Augustine say, that Christ ministered the half Sacrament to his Disciples in One Kind only. But saith M. Harding, Luke speaketh only of the Bread: Ergo, There was no wine.
Now, notwithstandinge wée haue graunted that S. Augustine expoundeth this place of the Sacrament, yet dooth not S• Augustine say, that Christe ministred the halfe Sacrament to his Disciples in One Kinde onely. But saith M. Harding, Luke speaketh onely of the Breade: Ergo, There was no wine.
This argument may be good in M. Hardinges Divinity, but it is of small force in good Logic.
This argument may be good in M. Hardinges Diuinitie, but it is of smal force in good Logique.
As for your Synecdoche, whereby of the part ye understand the whole (sayeth M. Harding) It is but a patch of your devise, and will not serve. Yet S. Augustine, S. Gregory, Bede, Julianus, Dionysius, Lyra, Wideforde, and others that understand these words of S. Luke of hospitality, must needs crave the warrant of a figure, and under the name of Bread must needs conceive meat, and Wine also: otherwise there had been a very simple, and a dry feast. Now if M. Harding can allow them the figure of Synecdoche, why may not he as well allow us the same? It is a manner of speech commonly used in all the Scriptures.
As for your Synecdoche, whereby of the parte ye vnderstande the whole (saieth M. Hardinge) It is but a patche of your diuise, and wil not serue. Yet S. Augustine, S. Gregorie, Bede, Iulianus, Dionysius, Lyra, Wideforde, and others that vnderstande these woordes of S. Luke of hospitalitie, must néedes craue the warrant of a figure, and vnder the name of Breade must néedes conceiue meate, and Wine also: otherwise there had beene a very simple, and a drie feast. Now if M. Hardinge can allowe them the figure of Synecdoche, why may not he as wel allow vs the same? It is a manner of speache commonly vsed in al the Scriptures.