A04474:944
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 2 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 2 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The B. of Salisbury.
The B. of Sarisburie.
This later clause (Ipsi proferant, & edant) Let them bring it forth them selves, and eat) neither is in the Greek, nor in the Decrees, nor in the former edition of the Councils. Certain words somewhat like, are found in Rufinus in this sort: Praesentibus Praesbyteris,1 Diaco•• ne dividant Eucharistiam, sed illis agentibus, Solùm ministrent. Si verò praesbiter nullus sit in praesenti, tunc demum etiam ipsis liceat divider. In the presence of the Priests, let not the Deacons divide, or minister the Sacrament, but only serve the Priests in their office. But if there be no Priest present, then let it be lawful for the Deacons to minister. Here is very small help for M. Hardinges purpose, onlesse perhaps he will say, that, Proferre, or divider, Is to minister in One Kind. But if he think this a very fond Translation, as it is in deed, then this authority might have been spared.
This later clause (Ipsi proferant, & edant) Let them bringe it foorth them selues, and eate) neither is in the Gréeke, nor in the Decrées, nor in the former edition of the Councels. Certaine woordes somewhat like, are founde in Rufinus in this sorte: Praesentibus Praesbyteris,1 Diaco•• ne diuidant Eucharistiam, sed illis agentibus, Solùm ministrent. Si verò praesbiter nullus sit in praesenti, tunc demum etiam ipsis liceat diuidere. In the presence of the Priestes, let not the Deacons diuide, or minister the Sacrament, but onely serue the Priestes in their office. But if there be no Priest present, then let it be lawful for the Deacons to minister. Here is very smal healpe for M. Hardinges purpose, onlesse perhappes he wil say, that, Proferre, or diuidere, Is to minister in One Kinde. But if he thinke this a very fonde Translation, as it is in déede, then this authoritie might haue béene spared.