A04482:374
The true copies of the letters between the reverend father in God John Bishop…The true copies of the letters betwene the reuerend father in God Iohn Bisshop…
The true copies of the letters between the reverend father in God John Bishop of Sarum and D. Cole upon occasion of a sermon that the said Bishop preached before the Queens Majesty, and her most honourable Counsel. 1560. Set forth and allowed, according to the order appointed in the Queens Maiesties iniunctions. Cum gratia & privilegio Regiæ Maiestatis per septennium.The true copies of the letters betwene the reuerend father in God Iohn Bisshop of Sarum and D. Cole vpon occasion of a sermon that the said Bishop preached before the Quenes Maiestie, and hir most honorable Counsel. 1560. Set forthe and allowed, according to the order appointed in the Quenes Maiesties iniunctions. Cum gratia & priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis per septennium.
London: printed by John Day, 1560
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
As for Gelasius how soever it pleaseth. D. Tapper to co•tue him, he sayeth plainly, that in the Sacrament there remaineth the substance, and nature, of bread and wine. But ye say, I allege Gelasius otherwise then I find him, and hereof your friends have made much a do. I see, it must be a very small fault that shall escape your eyes. Gelasius words be these. Non desinit esse substantia panis, vel natura vin•. Which words, having not the book at hand, I re ported thus: Non desinit esse substantia panis, & natura vini. I beseech you, how far went I […] from the words, or from the meaning of the author? I see it was ⟨p. 63⟩not for nought, that children in the Schools were wont to find a difference between these two propositions comedy bis panē, and bis panem comedy. But I perceive the fault was such that ye were loth to make matter of it. If I had altered any part of the sense and meaning of the writer, I trow, I had ben like to hear more of it.
As for Gelasius how soeuer it pleaseth. D. Tapper to co•tue him, he sayeth plainly, that in the Sacrament there remaineth the substaunce, and nature, of breade and wyne. But ye say, I alledge Gelasius otherwise then I fynde him, and hereof your frends haue made much a do. I se, it muste be a very small fault that shall escape your eyes. Gelasius wordes be these. Non desinit esse substātia panis, vel natura vin•. Which words, hauing not the boke at hand, I re ported thus: Non desinit esse substantia panis, & natura vini. I besech you, howe far went I 〈…〉 from the words, or from the meaning of the authour? I se it was ⟨p. 63⟩not for nought, that childrē in the Scholes were wonte to fynde a difference betwene these two proposicions comedi bis panē, and bis panem comedi. But I perceine the faut was such that ye were loth to make mater of it. If I had altered any part of the sence and meaning of the wryter, I trow, I had ben lyke to heare more of it.