A04482:628
The true copies of the letters between the reverend father in God John Bishop…The true copies of the letters betwene the reuerend father in God Iohn Bisshop…
The true copies of the letters between the reverend father in God John Bishop of Sarum and D. Cole upon occasion of a sermon that the said Bishop preached before the Queens Majesty, and her most honourable Counsel. 1560. Set forth and allowed, according to the order appointed in the Queens Maiesties iniunctions. Cum gratia & privilegio Regiæ Maiestatis per septennium.The true copies of the letters betwene the reuerend father in God Iohn Bisshop of Sarum and D. Cole vpon occasion of a sermon that the said Bishop preached before the Quenes Maiestie, and hir most honorable Counsel. 1560. Set forthe and allowed, according to the order appointed in the Quenes Maiesties iniunctions. Cum gratia & priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis per septennium.
London: printed by John Day, 1560
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But of the other part. I say, that such things as God […] commaū dead precisely by his word, may never ⟨p. 109⟩be broken by any custom, or consent And such be the things that we now require at your hands, not devised by men, but commaū dead by God to last for ever. Onlesse ye will haply say, as Montanus did, that God hath revealed both mo things, and also better things unto you, then ever he did unto his Apostles: or else, as Manicheus said, that the Apostle saw nothing, but only in speculo, & in aenigmate: or as your doctor Sylvester Prierias saith, Indulgentiae non habent authoritatem ex verbo Dei, sed habent authoritatem ab Ecclesia Romana, quia maior est. Pardons, sayth he, have no ground of gods word, but they have their ground of the church of Rome, which is a great deal more. The cup which ye have taken from the people, ⟨image 112⟩is not a ceremony, but a part of the Sacrament. And as good right as ye had to take that part away, so good right had ye to take away also the other, and so to leave the people nothing at all. And therefore yt old father Gelasius, saith, aut integra percipiant, aut ab integris arceantur, ether let them receive the hole Sacrament, that is to say, under both kinds, or else let them be put from the hole. By which words of the old doctor Gelasius, it may appear, that onlesse both parts of the Sacrament be received together, the Sacrament is mangled, & not whole.
But of the other parte. I say, yt such thinges as God 〈…〉 cōmaū ded precisely by hys word, may neuer ⟨p. 109⟩be broken by any custome, or consent And such be the thynges yt we now require at your hands, not deuised by men, but commaū ded by God to last for euer. Onlesse ye wil happely say, as Montanus did, that God hath reuealed both mo thinges, and also better thinges vnto you, then euer he did vnto his Apostles: or els, as Manicheus said, that the Apostle sawe nothing, but onely in speculo, & in aenigmate: or as your doctour Siluester Prierias saith, Indulgentiae non habent authoritatem ex verbo Dei, sed habent authoritatem ab Ecclesia Romana, quia maior est. Pardons, sayth he, haue no ground of gods worde, but they haue theyr groūd of ye church of Rome, which is a great deale more. The cup which ye haue takē frō the people,