A04482:89
The true copies of the letters between the reverend father in God John Bishop…The true copies of the letters betwene the reuerend father in God Iohn Bisshop…
The true copies of the letters between the reverend father in God John Bishop of Sarum and D. Cole upon occasion of a sermon that the said Bishop preached before the Queens Majesty, and her most honourable Counsel. 1560. Set forth and allowed, according to the order appointed in the Queens Maiesties iniunctions. Cum gratia & privilegio Regiæ Maiestatis per septennium.The true copies of the letters betwene the reuerend father in God Iohn Bisshop of Sarum and D. Cole vpon occasion of a sermon that the said Bishop preached before the Quenes Maiestie, and hir most honorable Counsel. 1560. Set forthe and allowed, according to the order appointed in the Quenes Maiesties iniunctions. Cum gratia & priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis per septennium.
London: printed by John Day, 1560
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But to avoid this authority sum §Hhmen of your side have ben forced to expound these words in this sorte: Non desinit esse substantia, hoc est, non desinit esse accidens. It leaveth not to be the substance of bread, that is to say, it leaveth not to be the accidence, or the form, or the shape of Bread. A very miserable shift.
But to auoid this authoritie sum §Hhmen of your side haue ben forced to expound these words in this sorte: Non desinit esse substantia, hoc est, non desinit esse accidēs. It leaueth not to be the substāce of bread, yt is to saye, it leaueth not to be the accidence, or the fourme, or the shape of Bread. A very miserable shift.
Even as right as the Scholie §Iiexpoundeth the Text. Dist. 4. Statuimus, id est, abrogamus. Yet doctor Smith of Oxford toke a wiser way. For his answer is, that Gelasius never wrote those words, and that they hang not together, and that there is no sense nor reason in them.
Euen as right as the Scholie §Iiexpoundeth the Text. Dist. 4. Statuimus, id est, abrogamus. Yet doctor Smith of Oxford toke a wiser way. For his answear is, that Gelasius neuer wrote those wordes, and that they hange not together, and that there is no sence nor reason in them.
Here have you that after the con,§Kk secration there remaineth the sub stance of bread and Wine.