But the promise maid to Jerusalem,1 appertains unto the Kirk. Ergo whosoever seruis not the Kirk shall perish.2 This hol• argument we admit, and m•st constantly we do affirm it, and yet shall he never be able to prove his intent,3 which is, that y• Kirk of Scotland is no Kirk. We will open the wound which the writer of the letter keeps covered, & yet it most grieves him, as it doeth the rest of all papistis. The Realm of Scotland (all praise to God) hes refused the Pap that Roman Antichrist, and not only be preaching, but also ⟨image 9⟩be the public Laws hes damned his tyrannical laws, his odious superstitions, and usurped jurisdiction. And therefore cry the papistis that we are declined from the true Kirk, and are fallen back from the Catholic faith.4 But before that they be able to convict us of those crimes, they mom preif two things, former, that whatsoever was promised to Jerusalem does properly and only appertain unto Rome, and this mon they do not be conjectures, but be plane words as God pronounced be his Prophet of Jerusalem. This is the first. The second is, that albeit Rome were as able to prove a promise maid to it, as Jerusalem was of whom it was said: This is my rest, hear will I dwell, because I have chosen it. And albeit that the popes of Rome whom he styles the perpetual succession of that Kirk, had as an assured & plane probation, that be god they were called, be God they were admitted, and that be God they should be maintained in their ministry & function, as that the Levites and succession of Aaron had to produce at all times for their defence, yet if they (we say) who call them selves the successors of the Apostles be not able to prove that they have constantly ⟨image 10⟩remained in the first league & covenant which Christ Jesus maid with his Apostles when he send them forth, to preach the glad tidings of the Kingdom, and to establish his Throne, not only amongst the Jews, but also amongst the Gentiles, according to the former prophecies. Albeit we say that all their former they were able to prove (as they are never able to do) yet have they said nothing y• may help their cause, nor •urt ours, onles that they therewith plainly prove y• the Kirk of Rome and the succession of the same hes remained and yet remaineth in the original purity of the Apostles, in doctrine, life, laws & ceremonies.
But the promeis maid to Ierusalem,1 appertenis vnto the Kirk. Ergo whosoeuer seruis not the Kirk sall perishe.2 This hol• argument we admit, and m•st constantli• we do affirme it, and yet sall he neuer be able to proue his intent,3 which is, that y• Kirk of Scotland is no Kirk. We will oppin the wound which the wryter of the letter keapes couerit, & yet it most greuis him, as it doeth the rest of al papistis. The Realme of Scotland (all praise to God) hes refused the Pape that Romane Antechrist, and not only be preaching, bot also ⟨image 9⟩be the publict Lawes hes dampned his tyrannicall lawes, his odious superstitiounis, and vsurped iurisdictiō. And therefoir cry the papistis that we ar declyned from the trew Kirk, and ar fallen back frō the Catholick faith.4 But befoir that they be able to cōuict vs of those crimes, thay mō preif two thinges, former, that whatsoeuer was promysed to Ierusalem dois properly and only appertene vnto Rome, and this mon thay do not be coniectures, but be plane wordis as God pronoūced be his Prophet of Ierusalem. This is the first. The secund is, that albeit Rome wer as able to proue a promise maid to it, as Ierusalem was of whome it was said: This is my rest, heare will I dwell, becaus I haue chosin it. And albeit that the papis of Rome whome he stylis the perpetuall successioun of that Kirk, had as an assured & plane probatiō, that be god they wer called, be God they wer admitted, and that be God they suld be māteyned in their ministerie & functioun, as that the Leuites and successioun of Aaron had to ꝓduce at all tymes for their defence, yet if they (we say) who cal them selues the successouris of the Apostlis be not able to proue that they haue cōstantlie ⟨image 10⟩remaned in the first league & cōuenāt which Christ Iesus maid with his Apostlis when he send them furth, to preache the glaid tydingis of the Kingdome, and to establishe his Throne, not only amonges the Iewis, bot also amonges the Gentiles, according to ye former propheseis. Albeit we say that all thir former thay wer abil to proue (as thay ar neuer able to do) yet haue they said nothing y may help their caus, nor urt ouris, onles that they thairwith planely proue y the Kirk of Rome and the successioun of the same hes remanit and yet remaneth in ye original puritie of the Apostlis, in doctrine, lyfe, lawes & ceremonies.
- 1Minor.
- 2Conclusi.Cōclusi.
- 3why the Pap• & Papists ha•e the Kirk of Scotland.why the Pap• & Papistes ha•e the Kirk of Scotland.
- 4what Pap• stes must prove be•oi• they be able to convict us or any other Natioun of apostasy […] the Kirk & […] Faith.what Pap• stes must proue be•oi• they be able to conuict vs or any other Natioun of apostasie 〈…〉 the Kirk & 〈…〉 Faith.