A07407:202
The justification of man by faith onlyThe iustification of man by faith only
The justification of man by faith only: made and written by Philip Melanchthon. and translated out of the Latin in to this our mother tongue by Nicholas Less of London An apology or defence of the word of God, declaring what a necessary thing it is, to be in all mens hands, the want where of is the only cause of all ungodliness committed through the whole earth, made by the said Nicholas LessThe iustification of man by faith only: made and vvritten by Phylyp Melanchton. and translated out of the Latyn in to this oure mother tonge by Nicholas Lesse of London An apologie or defence of the worde of God, declaringe what a necessary thynge it is, to be in all mennes handes, the want wher of is the only cause of al vngodlienes committed thorowe the whole earth, made by the sayde Nicholas Lesse
Imprinted at London : In Fleet street at the sign of the George next to Saint Dunstones church by William Powell, in the year of our Lord God .M.CCCCC.XLVIII. the .XI. day of October 1548Imprinted at London : In Flete strete at the signe of the George next to Saynt Dunstones church by VVilliam Powell, in the yere of oure Lorde God .M.CCCCC.XLVIII. the .XI. daye of October 1548
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
¶ If therefore the knowledge of god causeth, the love of god: so that without we know him, we can not have, neither him nor none of his benefits in estimation and valour of a good straw: it followeth consequently of necessity, that the lack of the knowledge of him, causeth the hatred and little good affection toward him, or any of his works. So that it followeth, that the cause that we love him not, is the cause we know him ⟨image 89⟩not. Nat as Judas knew him, which alway was present in company with him familiar with him, at board & table with him, which kissing his blessed mouth and knowing him corporally, betrayed him. Nat as the Jews knew him, which scourging and beating of his blessed body committed all kind of villainy, nailed his body to the cross, and so forth as the history maketh most godly & ghostly mention. For that corporal knowledge how little it profiteth, nay how much it hurteth (if you do rest there and go no further) the master of all heavenly knowledge Christ declareth with very plain words speaking of his own flesh and blood, saying: the flesh profiteth nothing at all: it is the spirit that giveth life and quickeneth. The lord did speak plainly, not meaning any other thing then he did with his mouth speak and declare. To mans judgement what thing could be more heavenly, more blessed (as it is in deed) than to have the body of our saviour, forty weeks within our own bodies, as the virgin Mary had? But if that she had not known him in her spirit a little more perfectly than her corporal knowledge might have given information, forsooth it should have profited her very little or nothing: she ⟨p. lxxxix⟩had ben no mete vessel, habitacle or mansion place for that sacred body. But giving credit at the last, forsaking her own reason and judgment, whereby she could not attain to the knowledge of God his will & pleasure, being of her self counselled to the contrary by natural reason, as by these words appeared. (Quoniam virum non cognosco) I never had fleshly knowledge and company with man: I know not what it meaneth: I can not tell, which way it should be so, most like a plain, simple, and virtuous maiden, feeling her spirits moved and new altered in her self (for the holy Ghost wrought marvellously in her and strongly) nature gave place, reason quaked, faith relived, so that to the words pronounced by the Angel.
¶ If therfore the knowledge of god causeth, the loue of god: so that without we knowe him, we can nat haue, neyther him nor none of his benefites in estimation and valour of a good strawe: it foloweth consequently of necessitie, that the lacke of the knowledge of him, causethe the hatred and lytle good affection towarde him, or any of his workes. So that it foloweth, that the cause that we loue him nat, is the cause we know him