A09365:1420
The Whole Treatise of the Cases of Conscience
The whole treatise of the cases of conscience distinguished into three books: the first whereof is revised and corrected in sundry places, and the other two annexed. Taught and delivered by M. W. Perkins in his holy-day lectures, carefully examined by his own briefs, and now published together for the common good, by T. Pickering Bachelor of Divinity. Whereunto is adjoined a twofold table: one of the heads and number of the questions propounded and resolved; another of the principal texts of Scripture which are either explained, or vindicated from corrupt interpretation.The whole treatise of the cases of conscience distinguished into three bookes: the first whereof is revised and corrected in sundrie places, and the other two annexed. Taught and deliuered by M. W. Perkins in his holy-day lectures, carefully examined by his owne briefes, and now published together for the common good, by T. Pickering Bachelour of Diuinitie. Whereunto is adioyned a twofold table: one of the heads and number of the questions propounded and resolued; another of the principall texts of Scripture vvhich are either explaned, or vindicated from corrupt interpretation.
Cambridge: printed by John Legat, 1606Cambridge: printed by Iohn Legat, 1606
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The fourth is forgiveness of satisfaction. This we are not alway bound to remit, but we may with good conscience, alway require satisfaction where hurt is done.
The fourth is forgiuenesse of satisfaction. This we are not alway bound to remitte, but we may with good conscience, alway require satisfaction where hurt is done.
Secondly, for the further clearing of this general Question, we are to answer some particular Cases usually propounded in the lives of men, and namely five.
Secondly, for the further clearing of this generall Question, we are to answer some particular Cases vsually propounded in the liues of men, and namely fiue.
I. Whether a man may defend himself by law? II. How he may defend himself by law? III. Whether a man may defend himself by force? IV. How? V. Whether a man may defend himself by Combat?
I. Whether a man may defend himselfe by law? II. How he may defend himselfe by law? III. Whether a man may defend himselfe by force? IV. How? V. Whether a man may defend himselfe by Combate?