A09950:712
The Breastplate of Faith and Love
The breast-plate of faith and love. A treatise, wherein the ground and exercise of faith and love, as they are set upon Christ their object, and as they are expressed in good works, is explained. / Delivered in 18 sermons upon three several texts, by the late faithful and worthy minister of Jesus Christ, John Preston, Dr. in Divinity, chaplain in ordinary to his Majesty, Master of Emmanuel College in Cambridge, and sometimes preacher of Lincolns Inn.The breast-plate of faith and love. A treatise, wherein the ground and exercise of faith and love, as they are set upon Christ their object, and as they are expressed in good workes, is explained. / Delivered in 18 sermons upon three severall texts, by the late faithfull and worthy minister of Iesus Christ, Iohn Preston, Dr. in Divinity, chaplaine in ordinary to his Maiesty, Master of Emmanuel Colledge in Cambridge, and sometimes preacher of Lincolnes Inne.
London: printed by W. Jones for Nicolas Bourne, 1630London: printed by W. Iones for Nicolas Bourne, 1630
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now this love shows it self by two effects: it would have the thing it loves to be preserved.
Now this love shewes it selfe by two effects: it would have the thing it loves to be preserved.
And secondly, a man that loves, would have it his, and therefore he draws near to it, or else he draws the thing near to him. For • take it not to be true that is commonly taken for granted, that love is a desire of union, for we do not always desire, that the thing should be united to us that we love, (for a thing may be too near us, as letters may be too near the eye, as well as too far off:) But we would have things in such a distance as is most agreeable to us, as we love fire for our use, but it may be too near us, and we love a knife for our use, but it may be too near: So by the way mark it, It is not always a desire of union, but it is a desire to have the thing it loves in such a distance, as is most agreeable to us: but still remember this, that love shows it self by these two effects: It desires the preservation of the thing: Secondly, he would that what he loves might be his. As when a man loves an unreasonable creature, when he loves a glass, when he loves a horse, he preserves the glass, he keeps the horse strong and fair, and if he can he would have them for his use. So a man that loves riches, or honour, or that loves a good name, he preserves them, he would have them his: that is, he would have them at his own arbitrement, for his own turn & service: So a man that loves his son or his friend, he desires the preservation of them, and withal he would have them his; that is, he would have them so sure united to him, as ⟨p. 8⟩may stand with his convenience. This is the nature of love; one thing more know of it, it is a commanding affection: Love and hatred are as it were the great Lords and Masters that divide the rest of the affections between them, as when a man loves, he desires, he goes and makes forward towards the thing he loves; if he obtain it, he rejoiceth in it; if he do not obtain it, yet if there be probability, then he hopes, if there be no probability, then he despairs; if there be any inconvenience and impediment that hinders him in his prosecution, he is angry with it, and desires to remove it: thus these affections hang on love. Again, on the other side, as love desires the preservation of the thing in a nearness and union of it: so hatred desires the destruction of the thing, and the separation from it.