A10170:671
The other part of Christian questions and answers which is concerning the sacraments, writ[n]…The other parte of Christian questions and answeares which is concerning the sacraments, writte[n]…
The other part of Christian questions and answers which is concerning the sacraments, writ[n] by Theodore Beza Vezelian: to which is added a large table of the same questions. Translated out of Latin into English by John Field.The other parte of Christian questions and answeares which is concerning the sacraments, writte[n] by Theodore Beza Vezelian: to which is added a large table of the same questions. Translated out of Latine into Englishe by Iohn Field.
London: printed by Thomas Dawson for Thomas Woodcocke, 1580
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Answer. Surely there can fall out no just cause that may excuse any change in so few words, wherein that same whole & perfect mystery of the divinity is declared.
Answeare. Surely there can fal out no iust cause that may excuse any chaunge in so fewe words, wherein that same whole & perfect mysterie of ye diuinitie is declared.
Question. What therefore if any man should say indeed of the Father, begetter: for, the Son begotten: for the holy ⟨image 110⟩Ghost, proceeding? What if in stead of three distinct persons he should call upon the Trinity?
Question. What therefore if any man should say indeede of the Father, begetter: for, the Sonne begotten: for the holy ⟨image 110⟩Ghost, proceeding? What if in steede of three distinct persons hee shoulde call vpon the Trinitie?
Answer. To what purpose I pray thee are these things, the Lord hath commanded in this mystery, that we should not call upon the personal proprieties, but upon the persons them selves, and that upon them distinctly. I will therefore never admit any affectate or devised form, in stead of that which is lawful.
Answeare. To what purpose I pray thee are these thinges, the Lord hath commaunded in this mystery, that we should not call vpon the personall proprieties, but vpon the persons them selues, and that vppon them distinctly. I will therefore neuer admitte any affectate or deuized fourme, in steede of that which is lawfull.