A10233:147
Two very learned sermons of M. Beza, together with a short sum of the…Two very lerned sermons of M. Beza, togither with a short sum of the…
Two very learned sermons of M. Beza, together with a short sum of the sacrament of the Lords Supper: Whereunto is added a treatise of the substance of the Lords Supper, wherein is briefly and soundly discussed the p[r]incipall points in controversy, concerning that question. By T.W.Two very lerned sermons of M. Beza, togither with a short sum of the sacrament of the Lordes Supper: Wherevnto is added a treatise of the substance of the Lords Supper, wherin is breflie and soundlie discussed the p[r]incipall points in controuersie, concerning that question. By T.W.
London: printed by Robert Walde-grave for T. Man, 1588London: printed by Robert Walde-graue for T. Man, 1588
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2 Secondly,1 we are to consider when it was instituted, to wit, before his death and suffering, and that immediately after he had with his disciples eaten the passover, by which we may see the Lord Jesus had as great ear for us, as for the fathers, before his being and manifestation in the flesh: providing also thereby, not only for our forgetfulness, that we might have the continual remembrance of his death & passion before our eyes,2 until his coming again, but for our instruction also, this being plain to us, in that circū stance of time, that forasmuch as the bread was broken in the supper before his body was crucified on the cross, that bread could ⟨p. 152⟩not be that same natural body, that was crucified on the cross, &c: as Papists grossly imagine and maintain, the reason is, because these things that differ in time, can not be said in all respects, yea, hardly in any respect to be the same.
2 Secondly,1 we are to consider when it was instituted, to wit, before his death and suffering, and that immediatelye after hee hadde with his disciples eaten the passeouer, by which we may see the Lorde Iesus had as great eare for vs, as for the fathers, before his being and manifestation in the flesh: prouiding also thereby, not only for our forgetfulnesse, that we might haue the continuall remembraunce of his death & passion before our eies,2 vntill his comming againe, but for our instruction also, this being plaine to vs, in that circū stance of tyme, that forasmuch as ye bread was broken in the supper before his bodie was crucified on ye crosse, that bread could ⟨p. 152⟩not be that same naturall body, that was crucified on the crosse, &c: as Papistes grossely imagine and maintaine, the reason is, because these things that differ in time, can not bee saide in all respectes, yea, hardlye in anye respecte to bee the same.