A10250:805
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of GenevaPropositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of Geneva, by certain students of divinity there, under M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthony Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodical summary, or epitome of the common places of divinity. Translated out of Latin into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardly dealt with else-where, may appear in the English tongue.Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.
Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegrave, 1591Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegraue, 1591
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
13 Jesus Christ then, to speak properly, suffered in his body and in his soul; yet notwithstanding, we may truly and Christianly say, that the Lord of glory was crucified, dead, &c. not that the Deity did suffer, (for the Divinity is imparible) but that this body and this soul, is the proper body and the proper soul of the WORD.
13 Iesus Christ then, to speake properly, suffered in his bodie and in his soule; yet notwithstanding, we may trulie and Christianlie say, that the Lorde of glory was crucified, dead, &c. not that the Deitie did suffer, (for the Diuinitie is imparible) but that this bodie and this soule, is the proper body and the proper soule of the WORD.
We do detest therefore, both the open Eutychians, who as they confound the proprieties and the natures: so they hold, that the Deity did suffer; & also the close and secret Eutychians, who are compelled in deed to confess, that the Deity did not suffer, but yet do hold, that the communicating of the proprieties of the Godhead and the Manhood, are real; even in respect of the natures them selves, and therefore, that the WORD in respect of it self, did suffer some thing.
We doe detest therefore, both the open Eutychians, who as they confound the proprieties and the natures: so they hould, that the Deity did suffer; & also the close and secret Eutychians, who are compelled in deede to confesse, that the Deitie did not suffer, but yet do hould, that the communicating of the proprieties of the Godhead and the Manhood, are reall; euen in respect of the natures them selues, and therefore, that the WORDE in respect of it selfe, did suffer some thing.
14 That base estate of the WORD, whereby he made himself of no reputation, not in himself, but in the flesh which was assumed, was especially seen, as it were with the eyes in his Passion, wherein the eternal Son of God as we may say, forgetting himself, if I may so speak, did hasten of his own accord unto such a punishment.