A10250:806
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of GenevaPropositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of Geneva, by certain students of divinity there, under M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthony Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodical summary, or epitome of the common places of divinity. Translated out of Latin into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardly dealt with else-where, may appear in the English tongue.Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.
Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegrave, 1591Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegraue, 1591
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
We do detest therefore, both the open Eutychians, who as they confound the proprieties and the natures: so they hold, that the Deity did suffer; & also the close and secret Eutychians, who are compelled in deed to confess, that the Deity did not suffer, but yet do hold, that the communicating of the proprieties of the Godhead and the Manhood, are real; even in respect of the natures them selves, and therefore, that the WORD in respect of it self, did suffer some thing.
We doe detest therefore, both the open Eutychians, who as they confound the proprieties and the natures: so they hould, that the Deity did suffer; & also the close and secret Eutychians, who are compelled in deede to confesse, that the Deitie did not suffer, but yet do hould, that the communicating of the proprieties of the Godhead and the Manhood, are reall; euen in respect of the natures them selues, and therefore, that the WORDE in respect of it selfe, did suffer some thing.
14 That base estate of the WORD, whereby he made himself of no reputation, not in himself, but in the flesh which was assumed, was especially seen, as it were with the eyes in his Passion, wherein the eternal Son of God as we may say, forgetting himself, if I may so speak, did hasten of his own accord unto such a punishment.
14 That base estate of the WORD, whereby he made himselfe of no reputation, not in himselfe, but in the fleshe which was assumed, was especiallie seene, as it were with the eies in his Passion, wherein the aeternall Sonne of God as wee may say, forgetting himselfe, if I may so speake, did hasten of his owne accord vnto such a punishment.
15 The condemnation of Christ under CAIAPHAS and PONTIVS PILATE, which is a matter of no small moment & consideration, went before the punishment which he suffered: