A10250:845
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of GenevaPropositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of Geneva, by certain students of divinity there, under M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthony Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodical summary, or epitome of the common places of divinity. Translated out of Latin into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardly dealt with else-where, may appear in the English tongue.Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.
Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegrave, 1591Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegraue, 1591
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
25 By the word DESCENSION therefore, is not meant any removing from a higher place to a lower, because that can properly agree neither unto the Deity, which is every where, nor unto the body, which of it self lay dead in the Grave, neither unto the soul, which being commended unto the Father, was straight way in Paradise, after it was separated from the body.
25 By the word DESCENSION therefore, is not ment any remoouing from a higher place to a lower, because that can properlie agree neither vnto the Deitie, which is euery where, nor vnto the bodie, which of it selfe lay dead in the Graue, neither vnto the soule, which beeing commended vnto the Father, was straight way in Paradise, after it was separated from the body.
26 Now the word HELL, which in the Scripture is diversly taken, signifieth neither the Grave, because that explanation should be superfluous and obscure; neither yet the place of the damned, as it is clear out of the former Principles.
26 Now the word HELL, which in the Scripture is diuersly taken, signifieth neither the Graue, because that explanation should bee superfluous and obscure; neither yet the place of the damned, as it is cleare out of the former Principles.
27 Therefore this Descension of Christ into Hell, which had an end at his death, went before the Article of his burial: but yet it is placed after the same in the order of speech, even because it was thought meet, to set down in one tenor of speech, whatsoever did belong to the humiliation of his body.
27 Therefore this Descension of Christ into Hel, which had an ende at his death, went before the Article of his buriall: but yet it is placed after the same in the order of speach, euen because it was thought meet, to set downe in one tenor of speach, whatsoeuer did belong to the humiliation of his body.