A10250:855
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of GenevaPropositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua
Propositions and principles of divinity propounded and disputed in the university of Geneva, by certain students of divinity there, under M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthony Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodical summary, or epitome of the common places of divinity. Translated out of Latin into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardly dealt with else-where, may appear in the English tongue.Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.
Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegrave, 1591Edinburgh: printed by Robert Waldegraue, 1591
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6 The Resurrection did abolish none of the essential qualities of the body: of which sort are, to have a quantity, and to be finite: whence followeth, that it is also enclosed within the compass of the members thereof; and is contained in a place.
6 The Resurrection did abolish none of the essentiall qualities of the bodie: of which sort are, to haue a quantitie, and to bee finite: whence followeth, that it is also enclosed within the compasse of the members thereof; and is contained in a place.
We do condemn therefore the Eutychians, who held that he had a body, that was not bodily: and the Valentinians, who said that it was an aery body: and the Marcionites, who turned his true body unto a shadow, both before and after the Resurrection.
We do condemne therfore the Eutychians, who held that he had a bodie, that was not bodilie: and the Valentinians, who said that it was an aierie bodie: and the Marcionites, who turned his true bodie vnto a shadow, both before and after the Resurrection.
7 By the same reason also doth fall to the ground that invented forgery, both of Transubstantiation, and Consubstantiation, as being altogether repugnant unto the truth of the body of Christ.
7 By the same reason also doth fall to the ground that inuented forgerie, both of Transubstantiation, and Consubstantiation, as beeing altogether repugnant vnto the truth of the bodie of Christ.