A10322:38
A defence of the judgment of the Reformed churches. That a man may lawfully…A defence of the iudgment of the Reformed churches. That a man may lawfullie…
A defence of the judgment of the Reformed churches. That a man may lawfully not only put away his wife for her adultery, but also marry another. / Wherein both Robert Bellarmin the Jesuits Latin treatise, and an English pamphlet of a nameless author maintaining the contrary are co[n]futed by John Raynolds. A taste of Bellarmins dealing in controversies of religion: how he depraveth Scriptures, misalleagthe [sic] fathers, and abuseth reasons to the perverting of the truth of God, and poisoning of his Church with error..A defence of the iudgment of the Reformed churches. That a man may lawfullie not onelie put awaie his wife for her adulterie, but also marrie another. / Wherin both Robert Bellarmin the Iesuites Latin treatise, and an English pamphlet of a namelesse author mainteyning the contrarie are co[n]futed by Iohn Raynolds. A taste of Bellarmins dealing in controversies of religion: how he depraveth Scriptures, misalleagthe [sic] fathers, and abuseth reasons to the perverting of the truth of God, and poisoning of his Churche with errour..
Dordrecht: printed by George Walters, 1609
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Asn he showeth by saying that where the common Latin translation hath 3[except for whoredom] in the Greek text it is rather read 4without the cause of whoredom. Supposing belike (whether by slip of memory or rather oversight)5 that the same words, which were used before in the fifth Chapter of S. Mathews Gospel to the same purpose, were used also in this place: whereas here they6 differ, and are well expressed by that in the latin by which S. Austin thought they were not so well. Howbeit, if thy had been the same with the former: yet neither so might Bellarmin allow his opinion: considering that the common latin translation (which Papists by there Council of Trent are bound to stand to under pain of ourse) expresseth7 those likewise as a plain exception.
Asn he sheweth by saying that where the common Latin translation hath 3[except for whoredome] in the Greeke text it is rather read 4without the cause of whoredome. Supposing belike (whether by slipp of memory or rather oversight)5 that the same words, which were vsed before in the fift Chapter of S. Mathews Gospel to the same purpose, were vsed also in this place: whereas here they6 differ, and are well expressed by that in the latin by which S. Austin thought they were not so well. Howbeit, if thy had bene the same with the former: yet neither so might Bellarmin allowe his opinion: considering that the comon latin trāslation (which Papists by there Councel of Trent are bound to stande to vnder paine of ourse) expresseth