A10659:374
Three treatises of the vanity of the creature. The sinfulness of sin. The life…Three treatises of the vanity of the creature. The sinfulnesse of sinne. The life…
Three treatises of the vanity of the creature. The sinfulness of sin. The life of Christ. Being the substance of several sermons preached at Lincolns Inn: by Edward Reynolds, preacher to that honourable society, and late fellow of Merton College in Oxford.Three treatises of the vanity of the creature. The sinfulnesse of sinne. The life of Christ. Being the substance of severall sermons preached at Lincolns Inne: by Edward Reynoldes, preacher to that honourable society, and late fellow of Merton Colledge in Oxford.
London: printed by Felix Kyngston for Robert Bostocke, 1631
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But then comes the second Case proposed, if a wicked man can do nothing but evil, then it seems he ought to leave undone all his Alms, Prayers, Fastings, and Religions services, because we are to abstain from every thing which is polluted with sin; and that which God will not see, man must not do. To this I answer No, by no means. The poor man at the pool of Bethesda, 1though utterly impotent and unable to crawl in when the Angel came to stir the waters, did not yet neglect what lay in his power to wait at the place, and to endeavour his own cure; Natural impotency can give no excuse to wilful neglect. When Simon Magus was in the gall of bitterness, yet Saint Peter directed him then2 to pray. Here then these two Rules must regulate this Case. First, a wicked mans necessity of sinning must not nullify the Law of God, which requires the doing of those things, though not with such an unclean heart as he doth them. The impotency of man must not either prejudice Gods Authority, or diminish his own duty. As, though where sin abounds Grace doth more abound, yet a man must not sin that grace may abound; so, though when a wicked man doth the things of the Law, he finneth, ⟨p. 247⟩yet he must not omit the duty, upon pretence to escape the sin. Secondly, when a thing is evill Propter fieri, because it is done, the doing of that thing is unlawful, and inti insecally sinful, and therefore to be avoided; but when a thing done is evil, not because it is done, but because something which should make the doing of it good and acceptable is omitted, and so it is evil not in the substance of thing, but by reason of the defects which cleave unto it, here this ought still to be done, but the other ought not to be left undone. Jehu was commanded3 to destroy the house of Ahab, he did so, and thus far he did well; but his ends and Gods divide the same Action, God out of Justice, he out of policy, and therefore though he esteemed it zeal, yet God accounted it murder and shedding of blood, and though as it was in substance the thing which God commanded, he did reward it, yet as the execution thereof was otherwise then he required, so he threateneth to revenge it: I will avenge 4