The whole world is a great *book, wherein we read the praise, glory, power, and infiniteness of him that made it, but man is after a more peculiar manner called [Greek or Hebrew] and [Greek or Hebrew] the image and glory of God; the greater world is only Gods workmanship, wherein is represented the wisdom and power of God, as in a building the Art and cunning of the workman; but man (in the original purity of nature) is besides that, as wax, wherein was more notably impressed by that divine spirit (whose work it is to seal) a spiritual resemblance of his own goodness and sanctity. Again, the greater world was never other than an Orator to set forth the power and praises of God; but he made the soul of man, in the beginning as it were his Oracle, wherein he fastened a perfect knowledge of his law and will, from the very glimpses and corrupted Relics of which Knowledge of his Law, some have been bold to call men [Greek or Hebrew] ▪ the kindred of God, And Senec. Liber Animus & Diis cognatus; which is the same with that of Aratus cited by S. Paul [Greek or Hebrew], for we are his off-spring, yea Euripides (as Tully in his * Tusculans observes,) was bold to call the soul of man, by the name of God; and Seneca will venture so farre too. Quid ⟨p. 402⟩aliud vocas animum quàm deum in humano corpore 2hospitantem. But to forbear such boldness, as (it may be) one of the Originals of heathen Idolatry: Certain it is, that there are (as Tully many times divinely observes) sundry similitudes between God and the mind of man. There are indeed some Attributes of God, not only incommunicable, but absolutely inimitable, and unshadowable by any excellency in mans soul, as immensity, infiniteness, omnipotency, omniscience, immutability, impassibility, and the like; but whatsoever spiritual, and Rational perfections the power & bounty of God, conferred upon the soul in its first Creation, are all of them so many shadows and representations3 of the like, but most infinite perfections in him.
The whole world is a great *book, wherein we read the praise, glory, power, and infinitenesse of him that made it, but man is after a more peculiar manner called 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 and 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 the image and glory of God; the greater world is only Gods workmanship, wherein is represented the wisdom and power of God, as in a building the Art and cunning of the workman; but man (in the originall purity of nature) is besides that, as wax, wherein was more notably impressed by that divine spirit (whose work it is to seale) a spirituall resemblance of his owne goodnesse and sanctity. Againe, the greater world was never other than an Orator to set forth the power and praises of God; but he made the soule of man, in the beginning as it were his Oracle, wherein he fastned a perfect knowledge of his law and will, from the very glimpses and corrupted Reliques of which Knowledge of his Law, some have beene bold to call men 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 ▪ the kindred of God, And Senec. Liber Animus & Diis cognatus; which is the same with that of Aratus cited by S. Paul 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, for wee are his off-spring, yea Euripides (as Tully in his * Tusculans observes,) was bold to call the soule of man, by the name of God; and Seneca will venture so farre too. Quid ⟨p. 402⟩aliud vocas animum quàm deum in humano corpore 2hospitantem. But to forbeare such boldnesse, as (it may be) one of the Originals of heathen Idolatry: Certaine it is, that there are (as Tully many times divinely observes) sundry similitudes betweene God and the minde of man. There are indeed some Attributes of God, not only incommunicable, but absolutely inimitable, and unshadowable by any excellency in mans soule, as immensity, infinitenesse, omnipotency, omniscience, immutability, impassibility, and the like; but whatsoever spirituall, and Rationall perfections the power & bounty of God, conferr'd upon the soule in its first Creation, are all of them so many shadowes and representations3 of the like, but most infinite perfections in him.
- *[Greek or Hebrew]. Orig. apud Euseb. de praepar. Evang. lib. 6. c. 11. F•nxit i• essigie• mod•tum c•ncta Deorum. Ovid. Met. 1. In alii• creatur […] est simili•udo dei tantùm per m• dumb Vest•i; in Sola Rationali Creatura per modum imaginis. Vid. Aquin. part. 1. qu. 93. art. 6. [Greek or Hebrew]. Philo. apud Euseb. de praepar. Eva•g. lib. •. cap. 18. [Greek or Hebrew]. Gieg. Nyssen. Serm […] in verb• illa s•amus […], &c. [Greek or Hebrew]. Arist. Ethic lib. •0 c 7. Deorum cognatione •enetur. […]. de Divin. lib. 1. & lib. de A•icit. Porphyr. apud Euseb. de pr•p. Ev•g lib. 11. cap. 28 lib. 1. Clem. Alex. in s• lib. 4 Strom•. Ipse etiam C•c. in somnio Scipio.〈non-Latin alphabet〉. Orig. apud Euseb. de praepar. Evang. lib. 6. c. 11. F•nxit i• essigie• mod•tum c•ncta Deorum. Ovid. Met. 1. In alii• creatur 〈…〉 est simili•udo dei tantùm per m• dum Vest•i; in Sola Rationali Creatura per modum imaginis. Vid. Aquin. part. 1. qu. 93. art. 6. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉. Philo. apud Euseb. de praepar. Evag. lib. . cap. 18. . Gieg. Nyssen. Serm in verb illa samus , &c. . Arist. Ethic lib. 0 c 7. Deorum cognatione enetur. . de Divin. lib. 1. & lib. de Aicit. Porphyr. apud Euseb. de prp. Evg lib. 11. cap. 28 lib. 1. Clem. Alex. in s lib. 4 Strom. Ipse etiam Cc. in somnio Scipio.