A10777:210
Certe[n] godly, learned, and comfortable conferences, between the two reverend fathers, and holy martyrs…Certe[n] godly, learned, and comfortable conferences, betwene the two reuerende fathers, and holye martyrs…
Certe[n] godly, learned, and comfortable conferences, between the two reverend fathers, and holy martyrs of Christ, D. Nicolas Ridley late Bishop of London, and M. Hugh Latimer sometime Bishop of Worcester, during the time of their imprisonments. Whereunto is added. A treatise against the error of transubstantiation, made by the said reverend father D. Nicolas Ridley. M.D.LVI.Certe[n] godly, learned, and comfortable conferences, betwene the two reuerende fathers, and holye martyrs of Christe, D. Nicolas Rydley late Bysshoppe of London, and M. Hughe Latymer sometyme Bysshoppe of Worcester, during the tyme of their emprysonmentes. Whereunto is added. A treatise agaynst the errour of transubstantiation, made by the sayd reuerende father D. Nicolas Rydley. M.D.LVI.
Strasbourg: printed by the heirs of W. Rihel, 1556
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But this answer well weighed doth minister good matter to the clear confutation of it self. For in deed we grant that in some points Origene did err / but those errors are gathered out / and noted both of S Hierom / and Epiphanius / soe that his works (those errors excepted) are now so much the more of authority / that such great learned men / toke pains to draw out of him / what soever they thought in him to be written amiss. But as concerning this matter of the lords supper / neither they / nor yet ever any other ancient author did ever say that Origene did err.
But this aunswear well weighed doth minister good matter to the cleare confutation of it selfe. For in deede wee graunt that in some pointes Origene did erre / but those erroures are gathered oute / and nooted boeth of S Hierom / and Epiphanius / soe that his workes (those erroures excepted) are now so muche the more of authoritie / that suche greate learned menne / toke paines to drawe oute of him / what soeuer they thoughte in him to bee written amisse. But as concerning this matter of the lordes supper / neither they / nor yet euer any other aunciēt authour did euer saie that Origene did erre.
Now because these two answers have been of late soe confuted and confounded / 1that it is well perceived / that they will take no place / therefore some which have written sense that time / have forged two other answers even of the same mould.
Nowe because these two aunsweres haue bene of late soe confuted and confounded / 1that it is well perceiued / that they will take noe place / therfore some whiche haue written sence that tyme / haue forged two other answeres euē of the same mould.
- 1Vuinchester in the answer to the 166. objection.