A14212:232
A14212:232
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
All the professors of the Gospel agree in this point, that the Supper of the Lord is a Sacrament of the new Testament, instituted and ordained by Christ, wherein together with the taking of bread and wine the true body and blood of Christ is received, and the communion or participation of Christ with all his blessings and benefits is sealed up in the hearts of the faithful believers.
All the professors of the Gospell agree in this pointe, that the Supper of the Lorde is a Sacrament of the new Testament, instituted and ordeined by Christ, wherin together with the taking of bread and wine the true body and bloud of Christ is receiued, and the communion or participation of Christ with all his blessinges and benefites is sealed vp in the heartes of the faithfull beleeuers.
Herein also all the professors of the Gospel agree in one, that this receiving of the Sacrament confirmeth our faith of the promises of grace both because this […] the general and common use of all Sacraments whatsoever; & also because Christ himself hath said of this Sacrament,1 Do this is remembrance of me. And, This cup is the new Covenant in my blood.
Herein also all the professours of the Gospell agree in one, that this receiuing of the Sacrament confirmeth our faith of the promises of grace both because this 〈…〉 the generall and common vse of all Sacraments whatsoeuer; & also because Christ himselfe hath said of this Sacrament,1 Doe this is remembraunce of mee. And, This cuppe is the newe Couenant in my bloud.
In this also there is a mutual consent of all; that the bread and wine are given and received visibly & corporally by the hand and month of the minister & communicants: but the body & blood of our Lord with all the benefits of his passion are invisible and spiritually given and received by them both.
In this also there is a mutuall consent of all; that the bread and wine are giuen and receiued visibly & corporally by the hand and month of the minister & communicants: but the body & bloud of our Lord with all the benefits of his passion are invisible and spiritually giuen and receiued by them both.
In all these, I say, there is a joint agreement between all divines which profess the Gospel: as for vain brabblers, whose brawls and jars may not be the measure whereby to judge of the consent, or controversies of the churches professing the Gospel, they neither agree in these, nor in any other.
In all these, I say, there is a ioynt agreement betweene al diuines which professe the Gospell: as for vaine brablers, whose brawles and iaries may not be the measure wherby to iudge of the consent, or controverses of the churches professing the Gospell, they neyther agree in these, nor in any other.
What is the union of the Sign signifying or the Thing signified in the Lords supper: whether it be Transubstantiation, or Consubstantiation, or only a mystical reference or relation of the one to the other.
What is the vnion of the Signe signifying or the Thing signified in the Lordes supper: whether it be Transubstantiation, or Consubstantiation, or only a mysticall reference or relation of the one to the other.
To this question we make an answer consonant to the Catholic faith in three several propositions, the two of which are Negative, and third Affirmative.
To this question we make an answere consonant to the Catholicke faith in three seuerall propositions, the two of which are Negatiue, and third Affirmatiue.
The Sig•es and the Things are not united by Transubstantiation, that is, by such a charge as in which the substance of •he Sign are transformed into the substance of the Things, the accidents only remaining.
The Sig•es and the Things are not vnited by Transubstantion, that is, by such a charge as in which the substance of •he Signe are transformed into the substāce of the Thinges, the accidents onely remaining.