A14212:263
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2 The second is framed on this manner; The bread is the body of Christ either in the truth of the thing (as Augustine according to Prospers opinion speaketh) or in a mystery signifying it. But it is not the body of Christ essentially & […] the truth of the thing▪ because there is no Transubstantiation. Therefore it is the body of Christ in a mystery so signifying.
2 The second is framed on this manner; The bread is the body of Christ either in the truth of the thing (as Augustine according to Prospers opinion speaketh) or in a mysterie signifying it. But it is not the body of Christ essentially & 〈…〉 the truth of the thing▪ because there is no Transubstantiation. Therefore it is the body of Christ in a mysterie so signifying.
3 The third reason is, because all the arguments by which the sacramental speech in the words of the Supper is proved are hithervnto belonging. For a sacramental union requireth sacramental phrases and terms.
3 The third reason is, because al the arguments by which the sacramentall speech in the wordes of the Supper is proved are hithervnto belonging. For a sacramental vnion requireth sacramentall phrases and termes.
4 The fourth is, because we have the testimonies of the Fathers, that the bread is a sign, figure ⟨p. 159⟩and sacrament of the body of Christ no longer absent, but present; and yet present not in the outward and visible elements of bread and wine, but in the word joined with them; present, I say, not to the mouth, but to the heart; not locally and in place, but mystically, and spiritually.