A14212:267
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The argument holds from the rule of things different; as if a man should say, This is a man, therefore it is not an Ox.
The argument holdes from the rule of thinges different; as if a man should say, This is a man, therfore it is not an Oxe.
We deny that this argument is framed, as you say,1 from the inducing of one special by the removing of the contrary of the same kind: because it is rather a faulty process in argumentation from the inducing of a sacramental respect which is but an Accident, to the displacing and denial of the subject & substance; such as this is, if I should say, This man is a Father; Therefore he is not a man. For so they argue, This bread is the body of Christ therefore it is not bread. There is therefore in this argument a Fallacy of Accident no less absurd the if you should thus conclude▪ This thing is a table▪ therefore it is not wood. For although the body of Christ be not the form or Accident of bread yet the Relation and respect which the bread