A14212:327
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3 They establish the sacrifice of the Mass, because, as it hath bin already said, whilst they are bound to worship Christ in the bread, they are enforced to ask of God forgiveness of their sins for that Christs sake, whom they bear in their hands; which is nought else but the Popish oblation of Christ.
3 They establish the sacrifice of the Masse, because, as it hath bin already said, whilest they are bound to worship Christ in the bread, they are enforced to aske of God forgiuenes of their sinnes for that Christs sake, whome they beare in their handes; which is nought els but the Popish oblation of Christ.
4 They of force admit the mangling or abridging one part of the Sacrament. For they retain the foundation, on which the Papists build this error. For whereas they hold a corporal presence of Christ in, with, under or to the bread, they must necessarily either withhold the cup from the Communicants, because, in their doctrine and opinion, the blood of CHRIST is in his body: or else they must separate CHRISTS blood from his body; then which nothing can be more absurd.
4 They of force admit the mangling or abridging one part of the Sacrament. For they reteine the foundation, on which the Papistes builde this errour. For wheras they hold a corporal presence of Christ in, with, vnder or to the bread, they must necessarilie either withholde the cuppe from the Communicantes, because, in their doctrine and opinion, the bloud of CHRIST is in his body: or else they must separate CHRISTES bloud from his body; then which nothing can be more absurd.
We offend not, as they charge us, in the defect, ⟨p. 169⟩but keep the mean.