A14212:338
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Arg. 1. The words of Christs institution are plain & evident, THIS is my body, THIS is my blood.
Arg. 1. The words of Christs institution are plaine & evident, THIS is my bodie, THIS is my bloud.
Auns. The words they cite are swords to cut their own throats. For they say that […] under, or with the bread, Christs body is really received; whereas Christ saith, that the bread it self is his body. Therefore they do the Church a double wrong. One, in that they thrust on her their own words instead of Christs. Another, in that they think her so blind that she cannot see the diversity of these two sayings. The bread is in the body; and, The bread is the body Moreover they make Christ a liar. For they deny that the bread is his body, and say, that his body ⟨p. 171⟩is in the bread. Let them look what answer they will make unto Christ in the last day of judgment concerning this despiteful and reproachful blasphemy. The Papists themselves rather retain Christs words then our Consubstantials. For they teach that the bread is so the body of Christ, that for sooth it is changed into the body of Christ. But these men keep not the word, but follow, as they say the sense and meaning. Wherefore we must search diligently whether of us •s in the truth. Our doctrine shall be proved in the end.
Auns. The words they cite are swords to cut their owne throats. For they say that 〈…〉 vnder, or with the bread, Christs bodie is reallie receiued; whereas Christ saith, that the bread it selfe is his bodie. Therfore they do the Church a double wrong. One, in that they thrust on her their owne words insteed of Christs. Another, in that they think her so blind that shee cānot see the diversity of these two sayings. The bread is in the bodie; and, The bread is the body Moreover they make Christ a lier. For they deny that the bread is his body, and say, that his body ⟨p. 171⟩