A14212:349
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Ans. This argument takes that for a ground which is in controversy: for they must prove that Christ said his body was in, under, or with the bread. Nay one may speak figuratively, & yet plainly to. Reply. 1. He is omnipotent. Ergo he can be every where, yea even in the bread.
Ans. This argument takes that for a groūd which is in controuersie: for they must proue that Christ said his body was in, vnder, or with the breade. Nay one may speake figuratiuely, & yet plainely to. Replie. 1. He is omnipotent. Ergo he can be everie where, yea even in the bread.
Ans. 1. Though he could make two contradictories at once true, yet he will not.
2. God cannot do things contradictory, because he is truth. But to will things contradictory is the part of a liar. We do not therefore deny the truth and omnipotency of God, but their lies; nay we defend it, saying that God doth what he speaketh. But they oppugn it, by teaching that in God are contrary wills.
2. God cannot do thinges contradictorie, because he is truth. But to will thinges contradictorie is the part of a lier. We do not therfore deny the truth and omnipotencie of God, but their lyes; nay we defēd it, saying that God doth what he speaketh. But they oppugne it, by teachinge that in God are contrarie willes.