A14212:368
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. Repl. There is an Emphasis in this word New. That which in the Old Testament was done figuratively, is in the New done really.
3. Repl. There is an Emphasis in this worde Newe. That which in the Olde Testament was done figuratiuely, is in the Newe done really.
1. Auns. If they add, Christ body is eaten therefore with the body mouth there is more in their conclusion, then is contained in their Proposition because there was no figure in the old Testament, which ⟨p. 175⟩signified the bodily eating of Christ.
1. Auns. If they adde, Christ body is eaten therfore with the boddy mouth there is more in their conclusion, then is conteined in their Proposition because there was no figure in the old Testament, which ⟨p. 175⟩signified the bodily eating of Christ.
2. Auns. We answer again▪ thus by retortion, The body of Christ is eaten no otherwise in the new Testament then in the Old. But in the Old it was eaten only spiritually. Therefore it is so eaten also in the New.
2. Auns. We answere againe▪ thus by retortion, The body of Christ is eaten no otherwise in the new Testament then in the Olde. But in the Olde it was eaten only spiritually. Therefore it is so eaten also in the Newe.