A14212:449
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1 Christ shall not be truly borne of the Virgin, if according to the nature of his humanity, he were truly & essentially without his mothers womb before he were borne, and after his birth were according to his humane nature as truly and substantially in his mothers womb as before.
1 Christ shall not be truelie borne of the Virgin, if according to the nature of his humanity, hee were truely & essentiallie without his mothers wombe before he were borne, and after his birth were according to his humane nature as truely and substantiallie in his mothers wombe as before.
2 In his humane nature Christ was not truly weak and subject to passions, if then also he were partaker of divine majesty and omnipotency.
2 In his humane nature Christ was not truly weak and subiect to passions, if then also he were partaker of divine maiestie and omnipotencie.
3 He was not truly dead, if in the very instant of death both in soul and body he were essentially every where present with his Deity. For his soul every-where-present with his every-where-present body could not really be separated by distance ⟨p. 199⟩of place, and therefore his body could not die but imaginarily.
3 He was not truely dead, if in the verie instant of death both in soule and bodie he were essentially everie where present with his Deity. For his soule everie-where-present with his everie-where-present bodie could not reallie bee separated by distance ⟨p. 199⟩