A14212:457
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Nestorius taught that God (which is the word) was united unto man only by participation of equality in majesty, honour, power, virtue, and operation. And that the difference of the words dwelling in man assumed by it, and in other saints, consisteth in nothing but in the very gifts and graces bestowed on man by God. This also the Ubiquitaries teach; because they say there is no difference between the dwelling ⟨p. 202⟩of the Deity in Peter and Christ, except such as is taken from communicating the gifts and properties of the Deity: maintaining that in this respect the manhood assumed by Christ is God, because the Word doth nothing without it, but all things by it. And this is nothing else but to make the man Christ to be God only by accident. Wherefore the opinion of the Ubiquitaries is all one with that of the Nestorians.
N•storius taught that God (which is the word) vvas vnited vnto man onlie by participation of equalitie in maiestie, honour, power, vertue, and operation. And that the difference of the wordes dwelling in man assumed by it, and in other saintes, consisteth in nothing but in the verie gifts and graces bestowed on man by God. This also the Vbiquitaries teach; because they say there is no differēce betweene the dwelling ⟨p. 202⟩of the Deitie in Peter and Christ, except such as is taken from communicating the giftes and properties of the Deitie: maintaining that in this respect the manhoode as•umed by Christ is God, because the Worde doth nothing without it, but al things by it. And this is nothing els but to make the mā Christ to be God onlie by accident. Wherfore the opinion of the Vbiquitaries is al one with that of the Nestorians.
Tertullianus. […] ▪ de Trin. pag. 610. If Christ be o•lie ••an, how is he present wheresoever he is called upon? whereas to be present every where, is not the nature of man but of God? By this sentence is felled the Ubiquity of the humane nature in Christ.