A14212:61
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And is it indeed so evident an oracle when Moses saith: Bara Elohim: that a verb singular joined with a noun plural must needs signify the unity of the divine essence, & trinity of persons? This Calvin took for none of the sufficient rest proofs of so great a matter. But if it be so strong and evident an argument of the Trinity, wh• did not you (Master Hannius) place it with the […] in your tract upon the Trinity? why did you quite over slip it?
And is it indeed so euident an oracle when Moses saith: Bara El•him: that a verbe singular ioyned with anoune plurall must needes signifie the vnity of the diuine essence, & trinity of persons? This Caluin tooke for none of the sufficient rest proofes of so great a matter. But if it bee so strong and evident an argument of the Trinity, wh• did not you (Master Hannius) place it with the 〈…〉 in your tracte vpon the Trinity? why did you quite over slip it?
The words of Eve, 1Gen. 4. Canuhiis• hath Jehovah: Calvin thus translated; I have obtained a man to the Lord: Hunn•us exclaimeth against him for corrupting a most evident testimony of the God head of the M•suas: 2because (in his opinion) Eve •aith, I have obtained a man he Lord. for a•h in Hebrew is a perpetual note of the accusative case. But if this be true, why then did the 70. Interpreters tram slate it by the Lord? 3