A14212:859
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The proof of the major denied is; In relatives one being taken away, the other also is taken away. ⟨p. 287⟩Answer to the rule, whereby the major is proved, by distinguishing. In relatives having but one only correlative, as a father, a sons one being taken away, the other also is taken away: but this rule holdeth not where are more correlatives then one; as to this covenant of God are correlatives not only the signs, but they also with whom this covenant is made, who shall endure for ever, &c: But these signs are correlatives to the covenant, not simply as it is a covenant, but as it is a covenant confirmed by signs.
The proofe of the maier denied is; In relatiues one being taken away, the other also is taken awaie. ⟨p. 287⟩Aunswer to the rule, whereby the maior is prooved, by distinguishinge. In relatiues hauing but one onely correlatiue, as a father, a sonnes one being taken awaie, the other also is taken awaie: but this rule houldeth not where are more correlatiues then one; as to this couenant of God are correlatiues not onelie the signes, but they also with whō this couenant is made, who shal endure for euer, &c: But these signes are correlatiues to the couenāt, not simplie as it is a couenāt, but as it is a couenāt cōfirmed by signes.
Note, that in the second part of this proposition, between God and the faithful, are included also the posterity of the faithful, as the part in the whole, though actually they do not yet believe, as infants. Therefore the definition is not more strict or particular then the things defined.
Note, that in the second parte of this proposition, betweene God and the faithfull, are included also the posteritie of the faithfull, as the part in the whole, though actually they doe not yet beleeue, as infantes. Therefore the definition is not more stricte or particular then the things defined.