A14463:1961
A Christian instruction, containing the law and the Gospel Also a summary of the…A Christian instruction, conteyning the law and the Gospell Also a summarie of the…
A Christian instruction, containing the law and the Gospel Also a summary of the principal points of the Christian faith and religion, and of the abuses and errors contrary to the same. Done in certain dialogues in french, by M. Peter Viret, sometime minister of the Word of God at Nymes in Province. Translated by I.S. Seen and allowed according to the Queens Majesties injunctions.A Christian instruction, conteyning the law and the Gospell Also a summarie of the principall poyntes of the Christian fayth and religion, and of the abuses and errors contrary to the same. Done in certayne dialogues in french, by M. Peter Viret, sometime minister of the Word of God at Nymes in Prouince. Translated by I.S. Seene and allowed according to the Queenes Maiesties iniunctions.
London: printed by Henry Bynneman? for Abraham Veale, 1573
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
P. For the first, there is no reason either to think or say, that the bread and the wine be converted or changed into the body and blood of Jesus Christ.
P. For the firste, there is no reason eyther to thinke or saye, that the breade and the wine be conuerted or chaunged into the body and bloud of Iesus Christe.
M. For what cause.
P. Because that if the bread & the wine did not remain still in the supper, bread and wine, in their proper substance, ⟨p. 326⟩they should not be the signs of the body & of the blood of Jesus Christ, but if they were converted into the same, they should be the self same thing, the which they ought to signify and represent unto us.
P. Bycause that if the bread & the wine did not remayne still in the supper, bread and wine, in their proper substance, ⟨p. 326⟩they shoulde not be the signes of the body & of the bloud of Iesus Christe, but if they were conuerted into the same, they shoulde be the selfe same thing, the which they oughte to signifie and represente vnto vs.