A14463:918
A Christian instruction, containing the law and the Gospel Also a summary of the principal points of the Christian faith and religion, and of the abuses and errors contrary to the same. Done in certain dialogues in french, by M. Peter Viret, sometime minister of the Word of God at Nymes in Province. Translated by I.S. Seen and allowed according to the Queens Majesties injunctions.A Christian instruction, conteyning the law and the Gospell Also a summarie of the principall poyntes of the Christian fayth and religion, and of the abuses and errors contrary to the same. Done in certayne dialogues in french, by M. Peter Viret, sometime minister of the Word of God at Nymes in Prouince. Translated by I.S. Seene and allowed according to the Queenes Maiesties iniunctions.
London: printed by Henry Bynneman? for Abraham Veale, 1573
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
M. And what inconvenient were it to hold our sanctification, for the cause of our salvation?
M. ANd what inconueniente were it to holde our sanctification, for the cause of our saluation?
P. For the better understanding of all this matter, it is meet that I expound unto thee yet the difference between the sanctification of Jesus Christ which is allowed us, whereof I have even now spoken, and that which is joined to our proper person, and then the fruits of the same.1
P. For the better vnderstāding of al this matter, it is méete that I expound vnto thée yet the differēce betwene the sanctificatiō of Iesus Christ which is allowed vs, whereof I haue euē now spoken, and that which is ioyned to our proper perso, and then the frutes of the same.1
M. What difference dost thou put therein?
P. I do call sanctification properly that, which we consider in the very person of Jesus Christ, ⟨p. 132⟩the which sanctification is not properly ours, as a quality conjunct to our person, but only by imputation.1
P. I do call sanctification properly that, whiche we consider in the very person of Iesus Chryste, ⟨p. 132⟩the which sanctification is not properlye ours, as a qualitie cōiuncte to our person, but only by imputation.1
M. What meanest thou by that imputation?
P. That it is allowed unto us, as his justice is attributed and allowed unto us, by the justification which we obtain in him by faith.
P. That it is allowed vnto vs, as his iustice is attributed and allowed vnto vs, by the iustificatiō which we obteyne in him by faith.
Mat. Is that the cause why Saint Paul saith, that God hath made Jesus Christ unto us wisdom, justice, sanctification, and redemption?
Mat. Is that the cause why Sainct Paule saith, that God hath made Iesus Chryste vnto vs wisdome, iustice, sanctification, and redemption?
P. There is no doubt of it, but it must be considered, that beside this kind of sanctification,1 that is so imputed and allowed unto us, there is yet an other, that is joined to our very person, not only by imputation, but as a quality sticking in us, which proceedeth from that first kind of sanctification, whereof we have even now spoken.
P. There is no doubte of it, but it must be considered, that beside this kinde of sanctification,1 that is so imputed and allowed vnto vs, there is yet an other, that is ioyned to our very person, not only by imputation, but as a qualitie sticking in vs, whiche procéedeth from that first kind of sanctificatiō, wherof we haue euen now spoken.
M. What virtue hath every of them in us?
M. What vertue hath euery of them in vs?
P. The first doth fully sanctify us before God, because it is full and perfect.
P. The firste doth fully sanctifie vs before God, bycause it is full and perfecte.
M. The other, is it not of the same nature and force?