A15057:41
An answer to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Jesuit in confidence whereof…An ansvvere to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Iesuit in confidence wherof…
An answer to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Jesuit in confidence whereof he offered disputation to the ministers of the Church of England, in the controversy of faith. Whereunto is added in brief marginal notes, the sum of the defence of those reasons by John Duræus the Scot, being a priest and a Jesuit, with a reply unto it. Written first in the Latin tongue by the reverend and faithful servant of Christ and his Church, William Whitakers, Doctor in Divinity, and the Kings Professor and public reader of Divinity in the University of Cambridge. And now faithfully translated for the benefit of the unlearned (at the appointment and desire of some in authority) into the English tongue; by Richard Stock, preacher in London. ...An ansvvere to the Ten reasons of Edmund Campian the Iesuit in confidence wherof he offered disputation to the ministers of the Church of England, in the controuersie of faith. Whereunto is added in briefe marginall notes, the summe of the defence of those reasons by Iohn Duræus the Scot, being a priest and a Iesuit, with a reply vnto it. Written first in the Latine tongue by the reuerend and faithfull seruant of Christ and his Church, William Whitakers, Doctor in Diuinitie, and the Kings Professor and publike reader of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Cambridge. And now faithfully translated for the benefit of the vnlearned (at the appointment and desire of some in authoritie) into the English tongue; by Richard Stocke, preacher in London. ...
London: printed by Felix Kyngston for Cuthbert Burby and Edmund Weaver, 1606London: printed by Felix Kyngston for Cuthbert Burby and Edmund Weauer, 1606
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
24 Pope Gelasius condemneth as sacrilegious the t•king away of the cup from the people, and commandeth that either both the elements be given to them, or neither. Page 164 25 Duraeus maketh the Manichees the first authors of dismembering the supper. ibid. nota 26 Vigilius denies the presence of Christ in the Church in both natures. ibid. 27 Chrysostom exhorteth all men to read the scriptures. ibid. 28 Augustine is wholly on the Protestants side. Page 165 29 By Gregory's judgement he that calleth himself Universal Bishop, is a fore-runner of Antichrist. Page 161 30 John Bishop of Constantinople first challenged the title of Universal Bishop. ibid. 31 What is meant by universal Bishop by Gregory's judgement, which toucheth the Pope home. ibid. nota 32 Boniface the 3. took the name of universal Bishop, and derived it to his successors. Page 166. nota
24 Pope Gelasius condemneth as sacrilegious the t•king away of the cup from the people, and commaundeth that either both the elements be giuen to them, or neither. Page 164 25 Duraeus maketh the Manechies the first authors of dismembring the supper. ibid. nota 26 Vigilius denies the presence of Christ in the Church in both natures. ibid. 27 Chrysostome exhorteth all men to reade the scriptures. ibid. 28 Augustine is wholly on the Protestants side. Page 165 29 By Gregories iudgement he that calleth himselfe Ʋniuersall Bishop, is a fore-runner of Antichrist. Page 161 30 Iohn Bishop of Constantinople first challenged the title of Ʋniuersall Bishop. ibid. 31 What is meant by vniuersall Bishop by Gregories iudgement, which toucheth the Pope home. ibid. nota 32 Boniface the 3. tooke the name of vniuersall Bishop, and deriued it to his successors. Page 166. nota
The sum of the seventh Answer, touching histories. 1 Campian only numbering up the Historiographers, foolishly concludeth, all are on their side. page 169 ⟨image 15⟩2 Protestants refuse not to examine their doctrine by histories, so they be not tied to the apparent blemishes in them. Page 170 3 Historiographers are tainted with the corruptions of their times, and the later they are, the more corrupt for the most part they are found to be. Page 161 4 The church of Rome is marvellously corrupted, though we could not tell when it begun to be so, and yet see the beginning of some particulars, as of usurped authority over Churches, of denial of Priests marriages, of worshipping Images, of carnal eating in the Sacrament of Transubstantiation of Purgatory of the Pope above Councils. Page 177. nota 5 The corruption of it gre not all at once no more then of Jerusalem, but by little and little, as in the Greek church also. Page 172 6 The heads of the heretics who rose up in the Greek church, so of those who rose up in the Latin church. ibid. nota 7 The Church all the Apostles time was a pure virgin, after their departure became corrupt. Page 173. 174 8 The promises of the Churches perpetual preservation from corruption, did and do belong to the Church of the elect, not to particular Churches. ibid. nota 9 In the Council of Afric where there were present Page 217. Bishops, and Augustine himself, the Bishop of Rome affected to have all appeals made to him, but the Council denied it unto him. Page 175 10 The Legates of the Pope forge a Canon of the Council of Nice to persuade this Council, which forgery is found out by search. ibid. 11 Augustine and the Bishops of Africa censured for schismatics by Boniface for resisting the Bishop of Rome, who affirmeth, that they were moved unto it by the Devil. Page 176 12 Eulalius the first Bishop of Carthage, who admitted the Popes power over the Churches of Africa. ibid. 13 Then became the Church of Rome plainly Antichristian, when Phocas the murderer granted to her to be the head of Churches, and Boniface the 3. to be universal Bishop. ibid.