A15061:314
An answer to a certain book, writtenAn answere to a certeine booke, written
An answer to a certain book, written by Master William Rainolds student of divinity in the English college at Rhemes, and entitled, A refutation of sundry reprehensions, cavils, etc. by William Whitaker ...An answere to a certeine booke, written by Maister William Rainolds student of diuinitie in the English colledge at Rhemes, and entituled, A refutation of sundrie reprehensions, cauils, etc. by William Whitaker ...
Printed at London : For Thomas Chard, 1585
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But tell me now, whether you think the Hebrew in these places to be corrupt, or no. I think you dare not so affirm, seeing your latin vulgar, which you account authentical, agreeth with the Hebrew, for the two last places. Then what is your argument out of these examples? gladly would I understand, if you could tell. That Christ and the Apostles cited places out of the old testament according to the Greek,1 was it because the Hebrew was contaminated, as you speak? If it were, then must you confess your latin translation, which you so much esteem to be full of corruption. Would you translate these places according to the Greek, because you find them cited by the Apostles according to the Greek? Expound your dream, Master Rainolds your, self, and ⟨p. 239⟩tell us what you saw. Calvin you charge for cutting the place of James clean away. Lay not the Printers fault upon Calvin. If he had meant, as you surmise, he would have cut the same sentence out in Saint Peter also. But there you have it set down in the text, and expounded in the commentary.
But tell me now, whether you think the Hebrew in these places to be corrupt, or no. I think you dare not so affirme, seeing your latine vulgar, which you account authenticall, agreeth with the Hebrew, for the two last places. Then what is your argument out of these examples? gladly would I vnderstand, if you could tell. That Christ and the Apostles cited places out of the olde testament according to the Greeke,1 was it because the Hebrew was contaminated, as you speake? If it were, then must you confesse your latine translation, which you so much esteeme to be full of corruption. Would you translate these places according to the Greeke, because you finde them cited by the Apostles according to the Greeke? Expound your dreame, Master Rainolds your, selfe, and ⟨p. 239⟩tell vs what you saw. Caluine you charge for cutting the place of Iames cleane awaie. Lay not the Printers fault vppon Caluine. If he had meant, as you surmise, he would haue cut the same sentence out in Saint Peter also. But there you haue it set downe in the text, and expounded in the commentary.