A15061:350
An answer to a certain book, writtenAn answere to a certeine booke, written
An answer to a certain book, written by Master William Rainolds student of divinity in the English college at Rhemes, and entitled, A refutation of sundry reprehensions, cavils, etc. by William Whitaker ...An answere to a certeine booke, written by Maister William Rainolds student of diuinitie in the English colledge at Rhemes, and entituled, A refutation of sundrie reprehensions, cauils, etc. by William Whitaker ...
Printed at London : For Thomas Chard, 1585
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The second place out of Jeremiah the 11. Chap. v. 19. is by your own confession void of corruption in the hebrew bibles now extant. Your argument for real presence out of this place is singular. The Prophet you say calleth Christs natural body upon the Cross by the name of bread. That is untrue: he speaketh not of Christs body, nor of the Cross, nor of real presence in the sacrament. And was Christs natural body hanging on the Cross nothing but bread? was bread crucified for you? Else how maketh this for your real presence? A strange presence, a goodly religion, a wonderful argument.
The second place out of Ieremie the 11. Chap. v. 19. is by your owne confession void of corruption in the hebrew bibles now extant. Your argument for reall presence out of this place is singular. The Prophet you saie calleth Christs naturall bodie vppon the Crosse by the name of bread. That is vntrue: he speaketh not of Christs bodie, nor of the Crosse, nor of reall presence in the sacrament. And was Christs naturall bodie hanging on the Crosse nothing but bread? was bread crucified for you? Els how maketh this for your reall presence? A straunge presence, a goodlie religion, a wonderfull argument.
The last place in the 95. psalm. v. 10. is no otherwise in the hebrew now, then not only in the Greek, but in the vulgar latin, and Saint Jeromes translation also, ⟨p. 278⟩The words a ligno, From the wood, your own fellows have confessed not to be of the hebrew verity, but of Christian devotion. Then is it plain enough, that whatsoever Justinus supposed, the hebrew text was not corrupted: And so your argument from Justinus authority is sufficiently cleared; and it is showed that these three examples prove nothing against the Hebrew original text now extant.
The last place in the 95. psalme. v. 10. is no otherwise in the hebrew now, then not onelie in the Greeke, but in the vulgar latine, and Saint Ieromes translation also, ⟨p. 278⟩