A15061:447
An answer to a certain book, writtenAn answere to a certeine booke, written
An answer to a certain book, written by Master William Rainolds student of divinity in the English college at Rhemes, and entitled, A refutation of sundry reprehensions, cavils, etc. by William Whitaker ...An answere to a certeine booke, written by Maister William Rainolds student of diuinitie in the English colledge at Rhemes, and entituled, A refutation of sundrie reprehensions, cauils, etc. by William Whitaker ...
Printed at London : For Thomas Chard, 1585
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
gIt was the parasceve of pasche. These and such like are the goodly flowers of their translation, besides the obscurity and ambiguity of sentences, by reason of leaving ⟨p. 371⟩out the verbs and other words in the English translation, which may in latin more easily be understood. Yet have they dealt something reasonably in adding a Dictionary to their translation, if it had been somewhat larger. Hereby the reader may judge, but better by reading the translation it self, whether I have not truly said of it, that it is a strange translation indeed, and such a one, as hard it were to find the like. But Master Rainolds answereth, that we rather delight in such novelty, then they, seeing they retain the ancient words, Mass, Priest, &c. and we refuse them: hereof hath been spoken before. And as for certain names of persons and places which some of our interpreters do reduce to the Hebrew sound, they cannot much trouble the reader, and they are rather used in books, then speech. Your accusation Master Rainolds of greater novelty in articles of faith amongst us, is false: and concerning the books of Judith, Maccabees, and the rest of that sort, we have spoken sufficient before: your other railing I omit.
gIt was the parasceue of pasche. These and such like are the goodlie flowers of their translation, besides the obscuritie and ambiguitie of sentences, by reason of leuing ⟨p. 371⟩out the verbs and other wordes in the English translation, which maie in latine more easily be vnderstood. Yet haue they dealt something reasonablie in adding a Dictionarie to their translation, if it had bene somewhat larger. Hereby the reader maie iudge, but better by reading the translation it selfe, whether I haue not truelie said of it, that it is a strange translation indeed, and such a one, as hard it were to finde the like. But Master Rainolds answereth, that we rather delight in such noueltie, then they, seing they retaine the ancient words, Masse, Priest, &c. and we refuse them: hereof hath bene spoken before. And as for certaine names of persons and places which some of our interpreters doe reduce to the Hebrewe sound, they cannot much trouble the reader, and they are rather vsed in bookes, then speach. Your accusation Master Rainolds of greater noueltie in articles of faith amongst vs, is false: and concerning the bookes of Iudith, Machabees, and the rest of that sorte, we haue spoken sufficient before: your other railing I omitt.