A15061:451
An answer to a certain book, writtenAn answere to a certeine booke, written
An answer to a certain book, written by Master William Rainolds student of divinity in the English college at Rhemes, and entitled, A refutation of sundry reprehensions, cavils, etc. by William Whitaker ...An answere to a certeine booke, written by Maister William Rainolds student of diuinitie in the English colledge at Rhemes, and entituled, A refutation of sundrie reprehensions, cauils, etc. by William Whitaker ...
Printed at London : For Thomas Chard, 1585
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
CHAP. 16.
Of the faults found in the Annotations of the new testament.
From the translation, which how vain and childish it is hath been declared, now let us proceed with you to the Annotations, which are meet handmaids for such a mistress. But before you come to speak of the particular faults, that were found therein, you discourse of many matters according to your common custom idly, and railingly, whereunto it booteth not to make answer: and therefore passing over what you have written of M. Jewell, M. Horne, &c. of Tower and Tyburn disputation, of the Churches stability, of M. Foxes monuments, of Luther's judgement concerning the sacramentaries, I will come to examine your defence of those faults, that were noted, and that as briefly as I can, reserving these causes to the large confutation of those Annotations, which in convenient time through Gods goodness will be (I hope) performed to Gods glory, defence of the trueth, and disproof of popish lies and heresies. Three kinds of faults were observed: the first of errors in matters historical: the second of false conclusions and arguments: the third of ⟨p. 379⟩certain blasphemies against the holy Apostle.
FRom the translation, which how vaine and childish it is hath bene declared, now let vs proceed with you to the Annotations, which are meet handmaides for such a maistres. But before you come to speake of the particular faults, that were found therein, you discourse of many matters according to your common custome idlely, and railingly, whereunto it booteth not to make answere: and therefore passing ouer what you haue written of M. Iewell, M. Horne, &c. of Tower and Tiburne disputation, of the Churches stabilitie, of M. Foxes monuments, of Luthers iudgement concerning the sacramentaries, I will come to examine your defense of those faults, that were noted, and that as brieflie as I can, reserning these causes to the large confutation of those Annotations, which in conuenient time through Gods goodnes wilbe (I hope) performed to Gods glorie, defense of the trueth, and disproofe of popishlies and heresies. Three kindes of faults were obserued: the first of errours in matters historicall: the second of false conclusions and arguments: the third of