A15857:1178
H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which now at length being 70. years…H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which novve at length being 70. yeares…
H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which now at length being 70. years of age, he caused to be published in the name of himself & his family. Englished in sense agreeable, and in words as answerable to his own latin copy, as in so grave a mans work is requisite: for the profit of all the unlearneder sort, of English christians, that desire to know his judgement in matters of faith.H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which novve at length being 70. yeares of age, he caused to bee published in the name of himselfe & his family. Englished in sense agreeable, and in words as answerable to his ovvne latine copie, as in so graue a mans worke is requisite: for the profite of all the vnlearneder sort, of English christians, that desire to know his iudgement in matters of faith.
Cambridge: printed by John Legat, 1599Cambridge: printed by Iohn Legat, 1599
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
10
For doth the deity understand by the humane understanding, or doeth it will by the ⟨p. 394⟩humane will? or doth it keep or sustain the humane nature in the person of the word, by the very same humane nature? or doth it bear all things by the humane flesh or rather by the word of it own virtue? Lastly, if the form of God do nothing but by the form of a servant, how can that saying of Leo be true: each form doth the property of it self with communion of the other?
For doth the deitie vnderstand by the humane vnderstanding, or doeth it will by the ⟨p. 394⟩humane will? or doth it keepe or sustaien the humane nature in the person of the word, by the verie same humane nature? or doth it beare all thinges by the humane flesh or rather by the word of it owne vertue? Lastlie, if the forme of God doe nothing but by the forme of a seruant, how can that saying of Leo be true: each fo rme doth the propertie of it selfe vvith communion of the other?