A15857:272
H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which now at length being 70. years…H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which novve at length being 70. yeares…
H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which now at length being 70. years of age, he caused to be published in the name of himself & his family. Englished in sense agreeable, and in words as answerable to his own latin copy, as in so grave a mans work is requisite: for the profit of all the unlearneder sort, of English christians, that desire to know his judgement in matters of faith.H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which novve at length being 70. yeares of age, he caused to bee published in the name of himselfe & his family. Englished in sense agreeable, and in words as answerable to his ovvne latine copie, as in so graue a mans worke is requisite: for the profite of all the vnlearneder sort, of English christians, that desire to know his iudgement in matters of faith.
Cambridge: printed by John Legat, 1599Cambridge: printed by Iohn Legat, 1599
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
XVI. Errors.
Therefore we condemn all aswell the ancient as later heretics, which ever taught or teach the contrary: Arrius, Photinus, & namely Seruetus, and all other ungodly men of that crew, which deny the true deity of Christ: the Cerdonians, the Marcionites, the Valentinians, the Manichees, the Priscillianits, the Apollinarists, and the rest which do oppugn the true humanity of Christ: some denying, that Christ came in the flesh, and that he had true flesh: and do contend that he brought a fantastical body from heaven, or that he was conceived of the elements, and not of the seed of Abraham, and that he was not borne of a woman: others granting him indeed ⟨p. 73⟩a true human flesh, but yet depriving him of a reasonable soul, and substituting his deity in place of his soul: Also the Nestorians, which denied the true union of the human nature with the person of the Son, & did set down two persons in Christ, and two Sons, the Son of God, and the Son of man. We likewise condemn the Eutychians, which on the contrary side, as Christ is but one only person, so they leave him but one nature only, namely the divine: teaching that the human nature which he assumed, either is wholly turned into the divine: or else so mingled and confounded with the divine, that they make no difference at all in him, between the proprieties and actions of his divine and human natures. We condemn also those which have proceeded from the former, as Macarius with his followers, which make but one only will in Christ, namely the divine, and therefore admit no proper action at all of the humane will in Christ. We condemn likewise the Cerdonians also in this point, that they said, Christ did not truly suffer, nor was truly dead, but that he feigned a suffering, or (as some heretics say) he suffered and died putatively: and therefore with these we also con den, all which taught or teach the like things: as namely, that Christ rose not again truly in the same flesh, wherein he died, but in another of a diverse nature: or else, that if he rose