A16596:177
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving…A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing…
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving of the Lords Supper. Delivered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, John Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing of the Lords Supper. Deliuered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, Iohn Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.
London: printed by George Purslowe, 1617
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1First, the holy Ghost doth plainly tell us, by call it often bread, after the words of Consecration, as 1. Corinthians 10. Is not the bread which we break, a partaking of the body of Christ, saith Paul?
1First, the holy Ghost doth plainely tell vs, by call it often bread, after the words of Consecration, as 1. Corinthians 10. Is not the bread which we breake, a pertaking of the body of Christ, saith Paul?
- 1The first reason against Transubstantiation.The first reason against Transsubstantiation.
Lo plainly he saith: The bread which we break, Not only calling it bread, but adding thereto breaking, which cannot be attributed, either to Christs body, whereof no bone was broken, either to any accident, but must needs be of a substance, which substance if it be not Christs body, cannot be but bread.
Loe plainely he saith: The bread which we break, Not onely calling it bread, but adding thereto breaking, which cannot be attributed, eyther to Christs body, whereof no bone was broken, either to any accident, but must néeds be of a substance, which substance if it be not Christs body, cannot be but bread.