A16596:180
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving…A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing…
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving of the Lords Supper. Delivered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, John Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing of the Lords Supper. Deliuered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, Iohn Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.
London: printed by George Purslowe, 1617
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1As for the Papists cavilling, how that it hath the name of bread, because it was bread: as Simon the Leper, was called still leprous, though he was healed: or as Moses Rod, being turned into a Serpent, was called a Rod still, it proveth nothing. For there was in the one a plain sight, and the senses certified that Simon was no Leper: and in the other, a plain mention, that the Rod was turned into a Serpent. Contrariwise, concerning the Sacrament, neither ⟨p. 94⟩the senses see any other thing then bread, neither is there any mention made of turning. And therefore their cavil is plainly seen to be but a cavil, and of no force. But to come again, to bring me reasons of transubstantiation.
1As for the Papists cauilling, how that it hath the name of bread, because it was bread: as Simon the Leper, was called still leprous, though hee was healed: or as Moses Rodde, being turned into a Serpent, was called a Rodde still, it proueth nothing. For there was in the one a plaine sight, and the senses certified that Simon was no Leper: and in the other, a plaine mention, that the Rod was turned into a Serpent. Contrariwise, concerning the Sacrament, neither ⟨p. 94⟩the senses see any other thing then bread, neither is there any mention made of turning. And therefore their cauill is plainly seene to be but a cauill, and of no force. But to come againe, to bring mee reasons of transsubstantiation.