A16596:192
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving…A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing…
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving of the Lords Supper. Delivered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, John Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing of the Lords Supper. Deliuered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, Iohn Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.
London: printed by George Purslowe, 1617
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1As for the cavil they make, that we are baptized into one body, meaning thereby the mystical body, and not the natural body of Christ, whereby they would enforce that we are fed with the natural body of Christ; but we are not ingrafted into it, but into the mystical body, and so put away the reason aforesaid. As for this cavil, I say, we may soon avoid it, if so be that we will consider how that Christ which is the head of the mystical body; is not separate from the body, and therefore to be ingrafted to the mystical body, is to be ingrafted into the natural body of Christ, to be a member of his flesh, and bones of his bones: as Pope Leo full well doeth witness, in saying: that Corpus regenerati fit caro crucifixi: The ⟨p. 101⟩body (saith he) of the regenerate, is made the flesh of Christ crucified. And hereto I could add some reasons for the excellency of Baptism. I think it be more to be gotten, then to be nourished. As for the excellent miracle of the patefaction of the Trinity, and the descending of the holy Ghost in Baptism in a visible form, the like whereto was no seen in the Lords Supper: I will omit to speak of further, then that I would you should know how it were no mastery, to set forth the excellency of this Sacrament, as well as of the Supper.
1As for the cauill they make, that wee are baptized into one bodie, meaning thereby the mysticall body, and not the naturall body of Christ, whereby they would enforce that we are fed with the naturall body of Christ; but we are not ingrafted into it, but into the mysticall body, and so put away the reason aforesaid. As for this cauill, I say, we may soone auoyde it, if so be that we will consider how that Christ which is the head of the mysticall body; is not seperate from the body, and therefore to be ingrafted to the mysticall body, is to be ingrafted into the naturall body of Christ, to be amember of his flesh, and bones of his bones: as Pope Leo full well doeth witnesse, in saying: that Corpus regenerati fit caro crucifixi: The ⟨p. 101⟩body (saith he) of the regenerate, is made the flesh of Christ crucified. And hereto I could adde some reasons for the excellency of Baptisme. I thinke it be more to be gotten, then to be nourished. As for the excellent miracle of the patefaction of the Trinity, and the descending of the holy Ghost in Baptisme in a visible forme, the like whereto was no seene in the Lords Supper: I will omit to speake of further, then that I would you should know how it were no mastery, to set forth the excellency of this Sacrament, as well as of the Supper.